Best potato chip f/avor. Discuss.
We// considering you won't te// me, it's how I'// have to envision you in my head for the time being.
I can't even provide any evidence to the contrary. I literally have a white-grey streak in my hair. It isn't to do with aging, but I cannot prove that, and I'm aware that you will see whatever you want to see. Ormici has a photo which I am in. Two, I believe. But you won't find much of use in them. I am fully covered.
This is on/y so/idifying my menta/ picture. Hum. Why cover yourse/f so thorough/y? Is it for the same reasons you dup/icitous/y obscure your own b/ood co/or?
Yes. And I don't believe it's duplicitous to conceal ones blood colour, but I understand that you have your own stance on the matter. You do sit in a place of relative comfort, after all.
My reasons are my own. I am an upho/der of the /aw. A seeker of truth and justice. Mere/y a b/ade, and the arm to wie/d it. Nothing more, nothing /ess. Though not exp/icit/y i//ega/, you stand on dubious ground.
Mm. You have a lot of opinions unrelated to your job for someone who is "merely a blade". That is a good thing. Being nothing but a weapon is not a life you want, even if you think you do. In terms of truth and justice, the truth is that the law and justice are not always in alignment. Let us say that someone has been kidnapped by someone of a higher caste. They, and some other victims, break free. Some victims remain left behind. In order to free those wrongfully captured, the lower-caste individual would have to break into the higher-blood's hive. According to the law, regardless of reason, that break-in would be more criminal than the kidnapping is. What is your opinion on this?
The /aw is abso/ute. Imperia/ Dictate, Number the first, Section Four point Four: Premeditated crimes against higher castes is punishab/e by fines, and potentia//y death in cases of higher-severity crimes, UN/ESS the act fa//s within the exceptions /isted in Imperia/ Dictates from Number the First, Section Six point One to Six point Nine. Imperia/ Dictate, Number the One Hundredth, Section Forty Point One Five: Knowing/y entering or remaining un/awfu//y inside a dwe//ing is a crime punishab/e by death. And, as I doubt anyone wou/d trespass upon highb/ood property unarmed-- Imperia/ Dictate, Number the One Hundredth, Section Fourty Point One Seven: Entering restricted properties or dwe//ings whi/e possessing a dead/y weapon or firearm is a crime punishab/e by death. This is not even accounting for the c/ear mens rea and actus reus that are present in your examp/e, and wou/d, beyond reasonab/e doubt, estab/ish criminia/ action worthy of punishment.
Mm. So you believe the ex-victim should not attempt to rescue the other victims? Let them rot in their misery and torment for the sake of following the law? I see where your sense of "honour" lies. At least you know the laws you follow so closely. Many only seek them out at a later date to justify themselves. Perhaps your understanding of them will aid you one day when your world is upturned. When you are the one in the position to wish to save someone. At least you took the little hypothetical seriously. I cannot fault you for your naivety. I hope only that you are given the opportunity to remain naive.
Tch. You understand nothing about me. You are mere/y a disrupter. Do not pretend to know me.
Hah. "Do not pretend to know me" is something I have heard from multiple people on this site. Trust me, I am well aware. I can only know what you present. My reactions exist only in relation to what you tell me. I do wish you well. Truly. I also wish you experience and growth.