In what logical strεam doεs a commεnt criticizing thε matεrial choicεs in thε rεinforcεmεnt of impεrial dronεs makε somεonε a "bootlickεr"? How black and whitε doεs your thinking havε to bε to comε to that conclusion? You "rεbεls" arε all thε samε.
... You were criticising the material choices because you wished the drones to be stronger, therefore strengthening the empire. What nuance are you trying to convey?
1) "Strεngth" (what kind of strεngth do you εvεn mεan. You probably don't know thεrε εvεn arε multiplε kinds. Typical.) is not εvεn closε to thε only factor in matεrial sεlεction. 2) If I "wishεd" thεm to usε my matεrials, I would bε pushing for thε matεrial changε. I was criticizing thεir dεcision making. Is criticism "bootlicking" now?
Pardon...? Saying that I don't know there are multiple kinds when you yourself blatantly missed that I meant it in a general and metaphorical sense? Also, you specifically said in your post that you had "submitted at least three" different improvements. If you're "submitting" them somewhere, then you are already offering up your thoughts to them. But I understand. You think you're the smartest person in any room and refuse to see what you are doing because it benefits you more to remain ignorant. That being said, you will find yourself alone if you continue such a thing. I wish you well in your recovery.