chittr
← @unforeseenFragment

:> So. Wh^t’s the gener^l opinion on ^liens. I don’t me^n the s^me gener^l biped^l bunch of folks who use this site. I’m t^lking beings with very different modes of existence from th^t. No, not horrorterrors. I me^n, th^t’s closer to wh^t I’m t^lking ^bout, but not quite. Something else. Yet, something c^p^ble of ^cting simil^r to ^ troll. So. How would people feel ^bout ^ being like th^t. <:

Kult: +52
Kull: +45
Total: 97
Ratio: 1.16

[⚙︎ For imperia| reasons I am hosti|e to such beings on paper. ⚙︎]

@subparNova[SN]

:> H^. F^ir enough. Im^gine it w^sn’t ^ “species”, though. Nothing ^t w^r ^g^inst the fleet. A different form of existence, but s^pient. An energy of sorts. A living concept. <:

[⚙︎ Intrigued most|y? How cou|d something |ike that exist? ⚙︎]

@subparNova[SN]

:> Perh^ps if it h^d ^ body m^de for it. In time it could even m^ke its own. Le^rn. Underst^nd. Spe^k just ^s ^ troll does. <:

[⚙︎ @gain, intrigued. Perhaps concerned as to the potentia| goa|s of such a being. ⚙︎]

Avatar
Verified
A user of established repute
@trickyTransmission[TT]

.) Qh! I think that wQuld be interesting! Like, I’d maybe be a little nervQus at first if I dQn’t knQw their intentiQns, but, like, Qnce I get tQ knQw them and they’re friendly, I’m sure it’ll be fine!! ))

@subparNova[SN]

:> If it h^d mor^lity, likely not one quite like ^ troll’s. But not inherently h^rmful either. C^p^ble of choice ^s we ^ll ^re. Perh^ps it would simply be curious ^bout ^ solid, more person-like existence. <:

:> F^ir enough. H^rd to trust something so unknown ^t first. You would need evidence it w^sn’t inherently destructive ^s some beings ^re. <:

Avatar
Verified
A user of established repute
@trickyTransmission[TT]

.) Yeah, true! And, like, the same can be said abQut trQlls tQQ, haha. Always gQQd tQ be a little careful in general! ))