Gabbie Peppie
@affableThespain
⋆.˚🃏⋆✮⋆˙Just a happy ☾ɭ๑𝔀ɳ*ੈ🎡‧₊˚ | bow wow! | ooc: kingGreed
=3:) Can s♡me♡ne g!ve me a c♡uuple suuggest!♡ns ♡n f!le h♡st!ng th!ngys s♡ my !mages st♡p dy!ng°
Who knows how to kill a ghost?
Don't have one of those, I fear.
Its alright. I'll figure it out. Thank you for trying.
⋆.˚🃏⋆✮⋆˙<꒰๑'ꀾ'๑꒱, I'd say hit em iɳ the fuɳɳy b๑ɳe but that's hard... g๑๑d ɭu☾k Haze!!*ੈ🎡‧₊˚
That w3r3nt pity bait it w3r3 mo2tly a jok3. I aint going cau23 my a22 only got thr33 look2. Partykini, tank top, button up.
Anyway. Musings. For all the various kinksters on this site I find myself surprised that I have not seen a single conversation about latex. Not one. Have I missed them? It isn't even really a kink of my own I am just slightly surprised by the lack of it when people here are... Well, the way that they are. Barely any conversations on leather, either, aside from talks of collars for "dogs", and even then, the leather is rarely the point of the matter. Are material-based kinks less popular than I thought? There are always so many of them at human pride, I hear. #nsfw #latex #leather #petplay
⋆.˚🃏⋆✮⋆˙I ɭ๑ve ɭatex aɳd ɭeather! Th๑ugh, ๑f ☾๑urse i d๑ have a super bias!*ੈ🎡‧₊˚
Good to know that there are some on the site who enjoy, I wasn't seeing any. Diversity of kinks is important. And a bias is how kinks work, no? So all is well.
⋆.˚🃏⋆✮⋆˙That's a shame! Pe๑pɭe are pr๑babɭy s☾ared ๑f beiɳg judged f๑r haviɳg ɳ๑ɳ-vaɳiɭɭa kiɳks. Eveɳ th๑ugh ɭatex aɳd ɭeather areɳ't that abɳ๑rmaɭ, I thiɳk. Aɳd true! That is h๑𝔀 they 𝔀๑rk, hehe. ꒰๑'ꀾ'๑꒱*ੈ🎡‧₊˚
Perhaps, yes. I would not be surprised. But then, petplay and several forms of edgeplay are quite common here... My assumption is that a few people were brave, started a trend, and they became popular this way, while latex and leather have simply not gotten off of the ground in the same way so people remain shy... Perhaps? Who's to say. #nsfw
⋆.˚🃏⋆✮⋆˙HMM, maybe a ɭ๑t m๑re pe๑pɭe ɭat☾h ๑ɳt๑ the petpɭay aspe☾t rather thaɳ the ɭeather/ɭatex parts. Th๑ugh maybe it'ɭɭ get pi☾ked up ๑ver time! I h๑pe s๑! *ੈ🎡‧₊˚
That's certainly what I've seen so far. I hope so also. Diversity is good. A wide swathe of various kinks would make browsing more fun than the same ones over and over. Although I suppose, if those are your exact kinks, then you would probably be in heaven, hah. #nsfw
⋆.˚🃏⋆✮⋆˙I agree; I thiɳk haviɳg a diversity ๑f kiɳks (aɳd ๑veraɭɭ iɳterests) is a g๑๑d thiɳg! AᏁD 𝔀hiɭe I d๑ ɭike edepɭay aɳd petpɭay, there are a ɭ๑t ๑f ๑ther thiɳgs that are g๑๑d t๑๑! ɭeather aɳd ɭatex beiɳg ๑ɳe ๑f them! *ੈ🎡‧₊˚
Absolutely. We are in perfect agreement. Imagine that we are shaking hands.
legally i still can’t make many statements at this given m/)ment
relatively neutral meeting y/)u i have n/) str/)ng /)pini/)ns whats/)ever
⋆.˚🃏⋆✮⋆˙That's ๑kay, it's a ɳe𝔀 begiɳɳiɳg aɳd start ๑f a reɭati๑ɳship, ɳeutraɭ ๑piɳi๑ɳs are aɭ𝔀ays 𝔀eɭ☾๑me. ꒰๑'ꀾ'๑꒱*ੈ🎡‧₊˚
y r u s/) p/)sitive?
idk man (gender neutral) there isn’t much 2 be s/) happy and expressive abt s/) likeeee idk
⋆.˚🃏⋆✮⋆˙There's pɭeɳty t๑ be happy aɳd expressive ab๑ut, I d๑ɳ't kɳ๑𝔀 𝔀hat t๑ be ɳegative ab๑ut ꒰๑'ꀾ'๑꒱*ੈ🎡‧₊˚
what c/)uld p/)ssibly be the reas/)n 4 u 2 be this p/)sitive th/)
well… i can’t quite argue with that. g/) have fun /)r whatever being all happy n shit
⋆.˚🃏⋆✮⋆˙I make a ɭ๑t ๑f ɳ๑ises 𝔀heɳ I m๑ve, jiɳgɭes, h๑ɳks, squeaks. S๑metimes 𝔀iɳd☾hime ɳ๑ises. S๑metimes I just pɭay musi☾.*ੈ🎡‧₊˚
