8><8ㅤਊne ><ust cਊnfess, ><y grasp ਊf the hu><an cਊnditiਊn re><ains la><entably rudi><entary, and thus, I find ><yself cਊ><pelled tਊ pਊse a query, albeit ਊne ਊf perhaps li><ited cਊnsequence. Is the designatiਊn "Strider" tਊ be interpreted as a distinct subspecies, ਊr rather, a title bestਊwed upਊn indi><iduals? The sheer ><ultiplicity ਊf such appellatiਊns a><ਊngst this cਊ><pany is, I dਊ belie><e, quite strange.ㅤ8><8
a single bloodline. 7ou're seeing several instan(es of the same, like, (ouple of people. e(hoes a(ross different universes
8><8ㅤAH, the ><atter ਊf these te><pਊral para><eters, I ><ust cਊnfess that such esਊteric sche><atics appear tਊ reside quite decidedly beyਊnd the pur><iew ਊf ><y allਊtted accreditatiਊn. I dare say, their ><ery cਊnte><platiਊn see><s tਊ transcend the established bਊundaries ਊf ><y prਊfessiਊnal jurisdictiਊn.ㅤ8><8
even those of us who do do stuff with it mostl7 just kinda wing it, to be honest. point to the multiverse theor7 and just put our heads down and run forward until it all works out
8><8ㅤਊne apprehends a certain degree ਊf peril in this prਊpਊsed cਊurse ਊf actiਊn, thਊugh ਊne ><ust cਊnfess, ਊne’s ਊwn cਊ><prehensiਊn ਊf the intricate nuances gਊ><erning te><pਊral jurisprudence is, alas, wਊefully insufficient tਊ render a truly authਊritati><e judg><ent. It is, I dare say, a rather fਊr><idable cਊnundru><.ㅤ8><8
honestl7, 7ou probabl7 don't need to reall7 do an7thing. just know that the7're all the same person kinda in different universes, or ignore them all entirel7, 7ou'll be fine