Thïs ïs whÿ mïdblööd nëvër shöüld hävë bëën ïnvëntëd äs ä tërm.
Bëcäüsë yöü rëplïëd? Thïs ïs höw cönvërsätïöns wörk.
y/)u didn’t need t/) c/)ntinue it
TW #hem9ism #hem9spectrum #antiquatedLanguage #pr96lematicRhet9ric P9pping in t9 say the 'traditi9nal' classificati9n 9f high/mid/l9w6l99ds assigns w9rth and value t9 s9me9ne 6ased s9lely 9n their 6l99d c9l9ur, which is an antiquated and frankly silly idea that sh9uld n9t 6e peddled. The terms 'c9ld6l99d' and 'warm6l99d' are m9re p9litically c9rrect, referring t9 their relative hues.
Cän Ï dïrëct ÿöü tö thë örïgïnäl pöst whërë ëvëryönë's ärgüïng? Ï thïnk yöü'd fït ïn mörë thërë änd Ï'd lïkë tö këëp ÿöü löt cöntäïnëd.
Trying t9 herd a warm6l99d (and an 9ff-spectrum individual, n9 less!) t9 a place y9u deem m9re accepta6le s9 y9u can tune me 9ut? C9mm9n tactic. Typical c9ld6l99d privilege at w9rk. I'm truly disapp9inted.
Nö önës ärgüïng hërë. Ëvëryönë's ärgüïng övër thërë. Ït'll bë mörë fün Ï prömïë. Ï'll ëvën ärgüë wïth yä övër thërë töö! Ökäy?
Y9u're right, there's n9 argument. 9nly measured, meaningful discussi9n and dial9gue which y9u seem hesitant t9 accept - likely due t9 the guilty feelings it und9u6tedly inspires in y9ur c9nscience. It's fine. I understand, and f9rgive y9u. I 9nly h9pe y9u can get past y9ur initial gut reacti9n and attempt t9 6etter y9urself, t9 minimize the harm y9u cause t9 th9se less privileged. The insinuati9n that I d9 this f9r 'fun' additi9nally trivializes the imp9rtance 9f such w9rk, and is a 6latant attempt t9 infantilize warm6l99ds and s9ften their c9ncerns.
Yöü dö sëëm lïkë yöü'd hätë fün. Thät ïs mÿ bäd. Ï'm sörry.
That's fine. Ap9l9gizing is the first step 9n the l9ng r9ad t9 redempti9n. Try #listening and #learning fr9m y9ur warm6l99ded peers, and practice empathy f9r their plight.