The Insufferable
@consultingGoodness
TW: This pr9file will c9ntain vari9us triggering t9pics related t9 in-depth discussi9n 9f pr96lematic issues pervading s9ciety, including 6ut n9t limited t9 #hem9ism, #classism, #a6leism, #slurs . . .
Greetings. I had intended this t9 6e an intr9duct9ry p9st in which I w9uld preemptively descri6e in detail the list 9f heavy t9pics and relevant tags and triggers that I will 6e using this pr9file t9 discuss, such that th9se wh9 stum6le up9n it w9uld 6e pr9perly warned 9f c9ntent that may cause distress and harm, h9wever while signing up I n9ticed a num6er 9f initial pr96lems which I must instead raise awareness 9f. First am9ng these is the assumpti9n that 9ne's preferred text c9l9ur is related t9 their 6l99d c9l9ur (TW f9r #hem9ism & #hem9n9rmativity), in that changing mine t9 the 6right red hue I prefer als9 set my 6l99d c9l9ur t9 'rust' (TW: #slurs) 6y default. Setting aside the fact that 'rust6l99d' is an incredi6ly 9ffensive slur that is der9gat9ry t9 6urgundy-6l99ds and sh9uld n9t 6e used, the presumpti9n that th9se wh9 enj9y the c9l9ur 9f red and related shades must 6e 9f th9se castes assumes a very narr9w w9rldview (n9 9ffense meant t9 th9se with literally narr9w views due t9 disa6ilities 9r ch9ice 9f eyewear) where 9ne's 6l99d determines their aesthetics, likes, interests and etcetera (which reinf9rces a #hem9n9rmative viewp9int) 6ut als9 c9mpletely disregards th9se wh9 identify with castes 9ther than the 9ne they were 69rn with. That y9u can still select a different c9l9ur 9f 6l99d after assigning y9ur text c9l9ur is at least a small c9ncessi9n, 6ut the damage has already 6een d9ne in such an instance. It d9es n9t help that the selecti9n als9 d9es n9t acc9unt f9r th9se 9utside 9f the spectrum, including th9se 9f yell9wgreen and 'candy red' (a phrase with s9me der9gat9ry c9nn9tati9ns, 6ut still prefera6le t9 the tag 9f 'mutant' 9ften applied) 6l99ds as well as a wh9le h9st 9f 9ther rarer c9l9urs. Denying pe9ple the a6ility t9 pr9perly express themselves and instead f9rcing them int9 neat little 69xes reinf9rces harmful ideas a69ut castes and the hem9spectrum as a wh9le, and we really sh9uld 6e m9ving past chaining 9urselves like such. I, myself, must designate my 6l99d as 'an9nym9us' in spite 9f the fact that I make n9 secret 9f its hue, and the insinuati9n that anything n9t c9nsidered 'n9rmal' 6y the standards 9f this site's administrati9n sh9uld 6e hidden away fr9m pu6lic eyes is simply insulting. There is m9re I c9uld g9 int9, such as h9w the metric 9f sweeps al9ne d9es n9t acc9unt f9r th9se 9f trans-m9rtal status living f9r centuries 9r even e9ns in dream6u66les where age ceases t9 6e such a c9ncrete num6er (which p9tentially c9nstitutes #ageism f9r assuming 9ne singular view, as well as f9r n9t acc9mm9dating individuals which ass9ciate with a different age 9r time peri9d than the 9ne in which they reside), 9r h9w the 'kult' and 'kull' metrics reinf9rce 9utdated and harmful ideas 9f p9pularity c9ntests and ranking pe9ple 6ased 9n psued9scientifical metrics 9f any kind, 9r the quadrant-6ased rating systems 6eing incredi6ly #quadr9n9rmative and p9tentially muddying the waters 6etween plat9nic enj9yment 9f a p9st versus r9mantic yearnings which create unsafe and undesira6le envir9nments f9r all inv9lved - 6ut f9r the sake 9f 6revity, I will leave 9ff here. Th9se interested in a part tw9 are invited t9 watch the #kankridiscussi9ns tag 9r discuss in the replies.
TO ME, MY PSIONIC WARRIORS. WE HAVE PROBLEMATIC ENEMIES TO MEET ON THE FIELD OF FAIR AND JUST BATTLE.
While as always I supp9rt the individual rights 9f all pe9ple t9 have fun and express themselves, I must reluctantly 9pp9se the title 9f "#sinday'. F9r starters, the implicati9n that all activity up9n this day is in s9meway imm9ral risks assigning undue c9nn9tati9ns t9 nuetral 9r even 6eneficial acts, which I f9r 9ne d9 n9t 6elieve is a precedent we sh9uld set. Sec9ndly, it implies a site-wide adherence t9 the c9ncept 9f sin (#sin #religi9n #religi9n9rmative) when n9t all are 9f a religi9n su6scri6ing t9 that c9ncept, 9r are n9t 9f a religi9n at all! Simply assuming this c9ncept is universal discredits the experiences and 6eliefs 9f many, many individuals, and minimizes the struggles 9f smaller faiths which are already d9minated 6y the m9re c9mm9nly-held 6eliefs. In additi9n, la6eling specific acti9ns as 'sinful 6ecause a deity (#g9ds #deities #metaphysicalfigures #t9xicp9werstructures) says s9' rather than delving int9 the exact reas9ns why an act can 6e harmful and the gr9ups 9f pe9ple it damages flattens the c9nversati9n; it's a th9ught-terminating cliche which we as disc9urse discussers sh9uld really m9ve past. [Genuine statement.] #kankridiscussi9ns
YOU SAID #OPPRESS FOUR TIMES IN THIS COMMENT. CLEARLY. YOU LOVE #OPPRESSION. JUST AS MUCH AS I LOVE #TOXICBEHAVIORS. #DEBAUCHERY ET AL. AND STRIDING PAST #BOUNDARIES. PERHAPS. ON #SINDAY. YOU CAN INSTEAD IMAGINE WHAT YOU WOULD DO WITH YOURSELF. IF THERE WAS NO MORE #OPPRESSION. AND REALIZE THAT LIKE BATTROLL DEFEATING THE FINAL CLOWN. YOU WOULD BE BEREFT OF PURPOSE. DARKNESS CANNOT EXIST WITHOUT LIGHT. NOR CAN YOU EXIST WITHOUT AN UNREPENTANT PIECE OF SHIT TO FOLLOW AROUND. IMPOTENTLY CHASTISING.
Th9ugh I thank y9u f9r y9ur additi9ns, I must c9ntend these p9ints. Firstly, 9f c9urse, I ap9l9gize if y9u have misinterpreted my w9rds 9r they have in any way caused harm, f9r it was n9t my intent. H9wever, I d9 n9t 6elieve there is such a thing as '9verc9rrecti9n' when it c9mes t9 ensuring harm is n9t caused, and in my hum6le 9pini9n we sh9uld all strive t9 c9rrect harmful phrasings and 6ehavi9urs when we see them t9 ensure a safer, fairer c9mmunity. Sec9ndly, my w9rds are merely suggesti9ns and pleas that 9thers may ch99se t9 willingly f9ll9w 9r ign9re; I h9ld n9 claim 9ver y9ur 9r any's will, th9ugh I w9uld h9pe that all w9uld 6e interested in ensuring they d9 n9t cause harm regardless 9f their gender 9r presentati9n which really is n9t the t9pic at hand either way.
⋅˚₊‧ ଳ ‧₊˚ ⋅ ⋅˚₊‧ ଳ ‧₊˚ ⋅ ⋅˚₊‧ ଳ ‧₊˚ ⋅ #untagged #kindofgoodapoint ⋅˚₊‧ ଳ ‧₊˚ ⋅ ⋅˚₊‧ ଳ ‧₊˚ ⋅ ⋅˚₊‧ ଳ ‧₊˚ ⋅
I dutifully tagged my usage 9f it, and use it 9nly t9 highlight the types 9f harm such systems 9f p9wer can cause! N9r did I imply that y9u, pers9nally, enj9y the t9pics I discussed - as whether 9r n9t y9u d9, and the ramificati9ns 9f such, are 6est left as an entirely different c9nversati9n - 6ut instead merely implied t9pics which are 9ften descri6ed as sinful. It d9es n9t mean I agree with such a la6elling, as I have h9pefully made clear I dislike it as a la6el in the first place, 6ut I ap9l9gize if this has harmed y9u 9r hit 9ne 9f y9ur triggers. If this is the case, h9wever, I w9uld highly rec9mmend that in future y9u tell me 9f such clearly and ahead 9f time t9 av9id situati9ns exactly like this. If such a day is t9 c9me a69ut, then I will rest easy in kn9wing I have d9ne my duty in 6uilding a kinder, fairer s9ciety. Even s9, I w9uld m9st certainly 6usy myself with teaching the hist9ries 9f pr96lematics, and ensuring future generati9ns d9 n9t f9rget the less9ns we have learned. There is always m9re w9rk t9 6e d9ne. [Genuine statement.]
ᐖ ARE U A HORGSE ᐛ
C9mm9n misc9ncepti9n, th9ugh I will f9rgive y9u f9r y9ur sweeping generalizati9n 9f equine creatures and assuming my p9nys9na's species. I, myself, am n9t a h9rse, 9r h99f6east, 9r a p9ny (which is what my ic9n is.) 6ut I enj9y 6eing depicted as such. Please refer t9 the f9ll9wing p9st: [ https://chittr.ing/pr9file/c9nsultingG99dness/dd5ee0c6-d926-4662-9eaf-6c6685047c62 ]
ᐖ I LIEK UR ᑈUTBIE MARK :3 ᐖA ᑈONTEAST ON ᐖAT IMAGE KINᐖA BALLZ ᐖOE I ᑈANT REAᐖE ᐖAT ᐛ
Ah. Thank y9u. I feel like it perfectly represents me, and my talents. L99king 6ack, I d9 agree that it c9uld 6e m9re legi6le; in an eff9rt t9 assist, I have edited the p9st t9 include alt-text descri6ing 69th the image and the text within, as well as pr9viding s9me c9ntext.
ᐖ WAOW UR SO KEWL.......FANX GUYE X3 ᐛ
.webp)
╰┈➤ˎˊ˗ ╰┈➤ .Commissions open. ╰┈➤ WWW.ill www.rite: ╰┈➤ X reader ╰┈➤ Most fetishes ╰┈➤ Gore ╰┈➤ #NSFWWW. duh ╰┈➤ WWW.ill www.rite for x3 the price: ╰┈➤ Rainbowww.drinkers ╰┈➤ WWW.erewww.olves ╰┈➤ Any vanilla shit ╰┈➤ WWW.𝙸LL WWW.R𝙸TE FOR FREE: ╰┈➤ M𝙸NDBREAK ╰┈➤ HYPNOS𝙸S ╰┈➤ PSYCHOLOG𝙸CAL MAN𝙸PULAT𝙸ON ╰┈➤ SPONTANEOUS SPAC𝙸AL EXPANS𝙸ON ╰┈➤ ABSTRACTED OFF𝙸CE SPACE ╰┈➤ EX𝙸STENT𝙸AL𝙸SM ABOUT DEATH ╰┈➤ THE "BACK ROOMS" (𝙸 www.ill not www.rite creatures in the back rooms) ╰┈➤ 𝙸 am especially fond of cosmic Godly figures, anyth.ing www.ith the depiction of such www.ill be discounted ╰┈➤ 𝙸 www.ork $20 per hour ╰┈➤ 𝙸 www.ill not www.rite someth.ing www.hich does not interest me ╰┈➤ Feel free to DM
╰┈➤ˎˊ˗ ╰┈➤ 𝙸 am in the mind that they are boring ╰┈➤ But yes ╰┈➤ 𝙸 will write dragons
╰┈➤ˎˊ˗ ╰┈➤ When someone corrects me it makes me squirm a little ╰┈➤ #WeShouldKnowMoreAboutEachOther
╰┈➤ˎˊ˗ ╰┈➤ Smell 🤤🤤🤤
I find my w9rds 9ften d9 make pe9ple squirm. Perhaps n9t in the way y9u d9, th9ugh. #implicati9n #suggestive #inappr9priateinnuend9 #als9iamceli6ate
╰┈➤ˎˊ˗ ╰┈➤ 𝙸 keep thinking about this ╰┈➤ You have been put upon this plane to divinely want me
"= free manipulation? :? ="
╰┈➤ˎˊ˗ ╰┈➤ Yesss @~,@
I feel 96ligated t9 discuss a 6urning matter that has made itself evident in these past few h9urs: The newer generati9n 9f My Little H99f6east is n9where as pr9gressive and trendsetting as its pri9r incarnati9n. I am s9rry, 6ut it is true. #mylittleh99f6east #disc9urse
Literally only 2 ppl care abt thiz
Minimizing issues helps n969dy, I am afraid. In fact, I think it 9nly causes m9re harm. That is why I am addressing this, the pr96lem which every9nd has had 9n their mind t9day.
True actually, plus the artstyle is unsettling IM꩜. Their faces are s꩜ much flatter and m꩜re tr꩜ll-like. It's called "my little H꩜꩜FBEAST" f꩜r a reas꩜n, d꩜ the new writers and artists n꩜t understand that?
I will cauti9n against jumping (9r whatever f9rm 9f swift, expl9sive m9ti9n y9u prefer) int9 analysis 9f its visuals, as aesthetics are 9nly skin deep; I think it distracts fr9m the true issue at hand, that 6eing the flattening 9f the messaging. Still, I can entirely appreciate h9w the uncanny (t9 s9me) visual style detracts fr9m the experience.
Thank y9u f9r reminding me t9 tag my c9ntent appr9priately. In my heated state, I rushed t9 express myself with9ut taking the necessary precauti9ns. I am #listeningandlearning.
<action; statement input; statement: i was being sarcastic input; statement: but sure />
Sarcasm is very difficult t9 detect 9ver text, and f9r the 6enefit 9f the s9cially-impaired it w9uld 6e 6eneficial f9r y9u t9 include relevant t9ne tags t9 make it clear y9u are 6eing sarcastic (which I w9uld als9 cauti9n against, as faceti9us dial9gue can cause misunderstandings that muddy the water and make it m9re difficult f9r us t9 c9mmunicate in an amica6le manner). Like this: [Genuine statement.]
Please remem6er that alth9ugh it is fine t9 expl9re y9ur sexuality (and I w9uld n9t think t9 kinkshame, 9r c9nd9ne such) (TW #sexuality #nsfw #kinks #c9llars #kinkshaming) that c9llars can actually represent incredi6ly t9xic dynamics that reinf9rce pr96lematic p9wer im6alances especially in regards t9 the hem9spectrum. As well, it sh9uld n9t have t9 6e said that treating 9thers like 6easts/pretending t9 6e such in sexual c9ntexts 69rders 9n s9me icky implicati9ns. As always, kink resp9nsi6ly. [Genuine statement.]
okay i'm a little drunk so maybe i wouldn't say this normally but fuck you i look fucking adorable in a collar and i hope someoneabuses the fuck out of me while i'm wearing it
I will n9t 6e silenced. S9me9ne has t9 speak up a69ut these very real and imp9rtant s9cietal issues, and and that s9me9ne is me. It is my 6urden t9 6ear.
TW: #su6stances #a6use Whether 9r n9t y9u l99k ad9ra6le is irrelevant t9 my 9verall argument, ultimately. I'm sure m9st pe9ple l99k ad9ra6le in 9ne. I'm sure even I w9uld. Actually #assumpti9ns #ad9ran9rmativity I sh9uld n9t assume, s9rry. I h9pe y9u rethink y9ur desire t9 have s9me9ne treat y9u in unhealthy and pr96lematic ways, 6ut ultimately it is n9t my place t9 pry int9 y9ur #r9manticentanglements.
I have 6een asked what the deal with my ic9n is, and whether that is what I l99k like IRL. While I pers9nally 6elieve these t9 6e mildly invasive questi9ns, I can at least understand the c9nfusi9n caused, and in the interest 9f 6eing c9mpletely transparent I will explain. It is a picture 9f my 'p9nys9na' (#s9na #alternatedepicti9ns #equine #p9ny), a representati9n 9f what I w9uld l99k like were I depicted in the 'My Little H99f6east' franchise. I will n9t g9 int9 great detail as t9 why; just kn9w that I 6elieve it a sh9w that - while n9t dev9id 9f its 9wn pr96lematic aspects - strives t9 teach imp9rtant m9ral less9ns and p9rtray a kinder, fairer s9ciety than many kn9w. Art n9t 6y me. Alt-Text: An image depicting a quadruped yet anthr9p9m9rphic p9ny, a small h99f6east-esque creature, which in this instance is als9 a depicti9n 9f 9ne Kankri Vantas. N9ta6le features include an angular sn9ut and p9inted ears, a s9mewhat messy and unkempt mane and a 6ushy tail, his reluctantly ic9nic red sweater and whistle, and a cutiemark (a marking 9n the flank 9r hindquarters which depicts a p9ny's 'special talent', the skill which they are 6est at and which 6rings them the greatest sense 9f purp9se and j9y) depicting a megaph9ne. Text within the image reads 'N9t t9 make the 96vi9us 96servati9n, 6ut... isn't it a 6it pr96lematic t9 6e attracted t9 characters 9f a media f9r gru6s?' which n9t 9nly highlights his enduring c9ncern f9r the pr96lematic, 6ut als9 references the 9ccasi9nally questi9na6le fand9m surr9unding 'My Little H99f6east' as a wh9le. [ https://p6s.twimg.c9m/media/GPnXf8CXUAExIpx.png ]
That's kinda cringe 8ro
Firstly, I 6elieve we as a s9ciety sh9uld m9ve past #th9ught-terminating-phrases such as 'cringe' 9r '6ased' which serve 9nly t9 pass swift and unth9ughtful judgement up9n things that really 9ught t9 receive m9re #nuance. Sec9ndly, expressing 9ne's self is n9thing t9 6e ashamed 9r em6arrassed a69ut (TW #repressi9n #shaming #s9nadiscriminati9n) and in fact it is kind 9f inappr9priate 9f y9u t9 try and shame me f9r elucidating 9n matters that were 6eing speculated a69ut. [Genuine statement]
References and in-j9kes make up a p9tentially pr96lematic set 9f 6ehavi9urs c9nsidering the in-gr9up which are aware 9f them is inherently excluding the 9ut-gr9up which has n9 kn9wledge. Furtherm9re, in future, it w9uld 6e helpful t9 utilize t9ne indicat9rs t9 clarify whether y9u are 6eing sincere 9r farcical. TW #exclusi9n #s9cial9stracizati9n #discriminati9n #pr96lematiclanguage [Genuine statement.]
LOOK CLOSELY AT THE EAR TO HEAD RATIO. THE SIZE OF THE HOOVES. THE SHAPE OF THE SNOUT. THAT IS NOT A PONY. IT IS AN ASS.
This is extremely presumptu9us and insulting (n9t that there is anything inherently wr9ng with 6eing a d9nkey, 9f c9urse.)
IT'S NOT INSULTING. IT'S NAMING ANIMALS. IF I WANTED TO BE INSULTING. I WOULD SAY. DO I NEED TO BREAK IT DOWN FURTHER. INTO COLORS AND SHAPES.
Sneak preview title f9r the essay I am currently drafting (TW: #agegaps #t9xicrelati9nships #r9mance #nsfw #quadrants #p9werdynamics #6i9essentialism): "9n R9mantic Entanglements Acr9ss The Hem9spectrum - Including 6i9l9gical Privileges, Pr96lematic Age Gaps, Im6alanced P9wer Dynamics, And H9w They Reinf9rce The Status Qu9." Please feel free t9 suggest 9ther t9pics I sh9uld include.
Seeing a l9t 9f p9sts a69ut 'cute 69ys' and 'cute girls'. Remem6er as well t9 6e inclusive and p9st a69ut 'cute gender-n9n-c9nf9rming individuals', and 9f c9urse 'ugly 69ys, girls, et al.' [Genuine statement.] TW: #attractiveprivilege #6eautystandards #p9tentialn9ninclusivity
That is erasure of their individual preferences.
This Implies Girls Can 8e Ugly #notveryfeministofyou
I understand the p9tential harm this can cause, and I am s9rry. I d9 n9t mean t9 imply that y9u sh9uld 6e attracted t9 all 9f the a69ve, n9r that y9u are n9t all9wed y9ur 9wn preferences. I merely wish t9 ensure that all gr9ups 9f pe9ple are given equal attenti9n in the sp9tlight. I am #listeningandlearning.
Y9u are right. I sh9uld have utilized m9re inclusive and less 9ffensive language in my p9st. I will instead endeav9ur t9 use the term 'less pulchritudin9usly privileged' in future. I am #listeningandlearning
Please refrain fr9m applying innuend9s t9 my p9sts, as they are imp9rtant and t9 6e taken seri9usly. Furtherm9re, as a chaste individual, it is a little 6it inappr9priate. Even m9re furtherm9re, the 6 and 9 are sacred sym69ls with a l9t 9f deep and imp9rtant meaning 6ehind them, and having them reduced t9 a mere sexual gag (#nsfw) is deeply insulting. [Genuine statement.]
Greetings. I had intended this t9 6e an intr9duct9ry p9st in which I w9uld preemptively descri6e in detail the list 9f heavy t9pics and relevant tags and triggers that I will 6e using this pr9file t9 discuss, such that th9se wh9 stum6le up9n it w9uld 6e pr9perly warned 9f c9ntent that may cause distress and harm, h9wever while signing up I n9ticed a num6er 9f initial pr96lems which I must instead raise awareness 9f. First am9ng these is the assumpti9n that 9ne's preferred text c9l9ur is related t9 their 6l99d c9l9ur (TW f9r #hem9ism & #hem9n9rmativity), in that changing mine t9 the 6right red hue I prefer als9 set my 6l99d c9l9ur t9 'rust' (TW: #slurs) 6y default. Setting aside the fact that 'rust6l99d' is an incredi6ly 9ffensive slur that is der9gat9ry t9 6urgundy-6l99ds and sh9uld n9t 6e used, the presumpti9n that th9se wh9 enj9y the c9l9ur 9f red and related shades must 6e 9f th9se castes assumes a very narr9w w9rldview (n9 9ffense meant t9 th9se with literally narr9w views due t9 disa6ilities 9r ch9ice 9f eyewear) where 9ne's 6l99d determines their aesthetics, likes, interests and etcetera (which reinf9rces a #hem9n9rmative viewp9int) 6ut als9 c9mpletely disregards th9se wh9 identify with castes 9ther than the 9ne they were 69rn with. That y9u can still select a different c9l9ur 9f 6l99d after assigning y9ur text c9l9ur is at least a small c9ncessi9n, 6ut the damage has already 6een d9ne in such an instance. It d9es n9t help that the selecti9n als9 d9es n9t acc9unt f9r th9se 9utside 9f the spectrum, including th9se 9f yell9wgreen and 'candy red' (a phrase with s9me der9gat9ry c9nn9tati9ns, 6ut still prefera6le t9 the tag 9f 'mutant' 9ften applied) 6l99ds as well as a wh9le h9st 9f 9ther rarer c9l9urs. Denying pe9ple the a6ility t9 pr9perly express themselves and instead f9rcing them int9 neat little 69xes reinf9rces harmful ideas a69ut castes and the hem9spectrum as a wh9le, and we really sh9uld 6e m9ving past chaining 9urselves like such. I, myself, must designate my 6l99d as 'an9nym9us' in spite 9f the fact that I make n9 secret 9f its hue, and the insinuati9n that anything n9t c9nsidered 'n9rmal' 6y the standards 9f this site's administrati9n sh9uld 6e hidden away fr9m pu6lic eyes is simply insulting. There is m9re I c9uld g9 int9, such as h9w the metric 9f sweeps al9ne d9es n9t acc9unt f9r th9se 9f trans-m9rtal status living f9r centuries 9r even e9ns in dream6u66les where age ceases t9 6e such a c9ncrete num6er (which p9tentially c9nstitutes #ageism f9r assuming 9ne singular view, as well as f9r n9t acc9mm9dating individuals which ass9ciate with a different age 9r time peri9d than the 9ne in which they reside), 9r h9w the 'kult' and 'kull' metrics reinf9rce 9utdated and harmful ideas 9f p9pularity c9ntests and ranking pe9ple 6ased 9n psued9scientifical metrics 9f any kind, 9r the quadrant-6ased rating systems 6eing incredi6ly #quadr9n9rmative and p9tentially muddying the waters 6etween plat9nic enj9yment 9f a p9st versus r9mantic yearnings which create unsafe and undesira6le envir9nments f9r all inv9lved - 6ut f9r the sake 9f 6revity, I will leave 9ff here. Th9se interested in a part tw9 are invited t9 watch the #kankridiscussi9ns tag 9r discuss in the replies.
Vernacular difference 9r n9, I think that it 6eing a slur s9mewhere is evidence en9ugh that it sh9uld n9t 6e utilized anywhere. I, f9r 9ne, am 9ffended 9n 6ehalf 9f all 6urgundy6l99ds when I see it utilized, and w9uld n9t wish that up9n th9se wh9 d9 find the phrase insulting and 9ffensive.
Wo+uld yo+u mind making a tldr o+r abridged versio+n?
I find that truncating 9ne's speech can end up with a l9t 9f am6iguity and uncertainties which harm the 9verall messaging, 6ut at the same time c9nsider that there are th9se wh9 struggle t9 read large quantities 9f w9rds at a time 9r wh9 suffer fr9m lacking attenti9n spans (I d9 n9t think less 9f them f9r it, 9f c9urse.) T9 that end: This p9st was initially g9ing t9 6e an intr9ducti9n t9 my pr9file as a wh9le, 6ut when signing up I enc9untered numer9us pr96lematic features (regarding #hem9ism, #assumpti9ns9f6l99dc9l9ur, #ageism, #slurs, #p9pularityc9ntests, #quadrantam6iguity & h9w they reinf9rce t9xic p9wer structures) that I simply had t9 highlight. Expect an actual intr9 p9st s9metime s99n.
I find it upsetting that yo+u fo+rgo+t to+ mentio+n dyslexia fo+r which I asked fo+r the abbreviated versio+n.
Y9u are unf9rtunately c9rrect. In my haste, I failed t9 pr9perly c9nsider all the disadvantages pe9ple may p9ssess that w9uld 6e 6enefitted 6y less ela69rate p9sts. F9r that, I ap9l9gize and endeav9ur t9 d9 6etter in future. I am #listeningandlearning.
I feel as if yo+u failed to+ include it so+ yo+u had an excuse to+ bitch + mo+an + call my request unreaso+nable.
9f c9urse n9t! Frankly, I'm a little insulted y9u think s9 little 9f me. Y9u kn9w I take disa6ilities very seri9usly, and strive always t9 ensure I d9 n9t cause th9se p9ssessing them harm fr9m unintenti9nal ign9rance and insensitivity. T9 that end, an even m9re summarized thesis statement f9r my p9st a69ve: Assuming 9ne's 6l99d c9l9ur and 9nly all9wing selecti9n 9f very narr9w 6l99d types reinf9rces #hem9n9rmativity and causes harm.
That co+nfirms that yo+u're my Kankri. It's go+o+d to+ hear fro+m yo+u. Well... I suppo+se to+ a degree it is in fact go+o+d.
Ins9far as any individual can 6e descri6ed as '6eing y9urs', 9r '6eing mine', 9f c9urse. I think it is imp9rtant t9 6e wary 9f utilizing such p9ssessive language, as it risks undermining 9ne's independence and agency - which may 6e especially imp9rtant t9 th9se such as I, wh9 insist up9n n9t requiring c9ddling 9r culling. H9wever, I will c9ncur it is pleasant.
Yes I mean we are o+f the same o+r similar timelines.