+..I remember when I was invi♱ed ♱o do a small in♱erview early in my career and ♱he in♱erviewer asked me wha♱ my ideal par♱ner was. I skipped ♱he ques♱ion because i♱ fel♱ unimpor♱an♱ bu♱ now I wonder wha♱ I would have said back ♱hen if I en♱er♱ained i♱. Probably a crea♱ive wi♱h in♱elligence. No♱ a model. I would never da♱e a model...+
+..I'm a model, why would I wan♱ ♱o da♱e someone in ♱he same career as myself? Tha♱ and ♱hey're usually drug addic♱ed nymphos...+
[ What an evasive question. You shou|d report it as unethica| practice to the EEOC. ]
+..Working ♱he same job does no♱ au♱oma♱ically make you a sui♱ed par♱ner. Everyone's mo♱ives for work is differen♱ and relying on ♱ha♱ aspec♱ alone is s♱upid..+
I mostly agrree with you about not /)ating within yourr (arreerr forr flush an/) pale. A goo/) pit(h rrivalrry (an be /)one within a (arreerr, but it takes the rright perrson, not just any shmu(k /)oing the same job as you! As forr i/)eal perrson to /)ate, hmm. That's an interresting question. I /)on't know that therre is an a((urrate answerr? Therre's so many ways it (an go forr everryone, an/) theirr /)ifferren(e /)oes not mean they arre worrse.
+..I♱'s abou♱ ♱as♱e and preference if you've been da♱ing ♱rolls a♱ ♱he bare minimum. I personally don'♱ like being s♱ric♱ on any♱hing I do because labels are useless ♱o me so I go for a♱♱ribu♱es I like in someone and any♱hing else will go from ♱here...+