I see last nig)(t experienced a conversation surrounding killing all violets. I'm aware, as a fuc)(sia, I'm liable to being grouped in wit)( violets in any societal discussion, but I )(ave to say my supposed equals are a bunc)( fools. You s)(ould understand t)(at "Kill all violets" already exludes these strawmen good violets. Just like "Eat the rich" )(as a baked in caveat t)(at excludes t)(ose who legitimately worked for t)(eir wealth, and are only ric)( as a result of being fairly compensated for t)(eir )(ig)( value skills, suc)( as doctors and lawyers. If you can understand t)(at t)(e petite bourgeoisie are closer to t)(e proletariat in any meaningful discussion of wealt)( disparity, t)(en you can also understand t)(at "Kill all violets" excludes any violet w)(o uses t)(eir position of societal power to benefit t)(ose of less power. And if you're incapable of identifying wit)( t)(at caveat, t)(en t)(at's a you problem and you s)(ould work to become a "good" violet. No, abdicating t)(at societal power does not qualify you as a good violet eit)(er, it just means you're ignoring t)(e injustices you )(ave t)(e power to resolve. Anyone w)(o )(as issue wit)( #killallvioletbloods is a fool 3B/