I don'+ believe I've bo+hered. experiencing any sor+ of 'crushes'. beyond my spouse. in sweeps. +hey occupy +he bulk. of my flushed fixa+ions. and no+ions of +he pale or pi+ch. have always seemed so lacking. I canno+ see +he appeal.
i dø nøt understand peøple whø experience these things as fleeting whims. ør cøllect rømantic partners like trinkets. a wørthwhile pitchmate is a far cry frøm the paltry "rivalries" yøu see sø many blathering abøut. usually thøse whø are still very yøung. thøugh even many whø are nøt seem tø participate in such a watered-døwn cøncept øf kismesissitude that i hardly see the pøint. the idea øf palemance feels. repellent.
mm. nor do I. i+ is less +he concep+ of having more +han one. and more +ha+ i+ seems like many collec+ +hem. simply +o say +hey have +hem. so I am +o unders+and. I believe I recall a few +imes you rambled abou+ +he +opic. on +umblr. as i+'s hardly be++er +here. I s+ill s+ruggle +o comprehend i+. previous a++emp+s have all proven. incredibly lacklus+er. I do however. recall how amusing your dis+as+e for +he pale quadran+ as a whole is.
i cannøt relate tø thøse whø can feel that way før sø many at øne time. but før thøse whø dø, there is a pøint where it begins tø feel disingenuøus, tø say the least. øh indeed. i have many øpiniøns and few øf them favørable. between the ønes whø treat it as an excuse før blatant abuse. thøse whø call wigglerish bickering "rivalry". and thøse whø are sø søft abøut it that it may as well be flush. and then i recall just høw yøung the average søcial media user is. particularly here. and briefly cøntemplate the merits øf self-immølatiøn. i simply cannøt cønceive øf a circumstance in which sømeøne expressing pale inclinatiøns tøward me wøuld feel anything but gravely insulting. nør dø i see the pøint. idanus grøunds me. i wøuld bite anyøne whø tried tø claim it tø be evidence øf any sørt øf vacillatiøn. but what dø i knøw. perhaps if 90% øf pale discussiøn was nøt nauseatingly saccharine it wøuld feel less distasteful as a whøle.