
¶ DIFF3R3NT STROK3S AND ALL THAT BUT I THINK IT WOULD FUCK LIK3 H3LL TO PILOT A M3CH. B3ATS A SHIP BY L3APS AND BOUNDS. L3AGU3S 3V3N.
:> Oh, for style ^nd sheer fun, they're better th^n ^ lot of ships, I ^gree. Unfortun^tely, they ^lso h^ve signific^ntly more we^knesses...it's too b^d. I re^lly love them in principle, but the gr^vity of most pl^nets ^nd their power needs m^ke them less optim^l in most situ^tions. <:

¶ CONSID3R. TH3 HUMBL3 Y3T POW3RFUL PSIONIC ABILITY OF T3L3KIN3SIS. IF IT W3R3 M3 PILOTING ON3, I'D JUST US3 THAT TO MAN3UV3R M3 AROUND. B3SID3S J3TBURST SYST3MS.
:> Very true. A telekinetic, ferrokinetic, electrokinetic, or suit^ble psiionic type (like you) would be ide^l...I think the empire h^s ^ sm^ll b^tt^lion of such pilots. H^ven't thought ^bout those in ^ while. <:

¶ I SHOULD B3 ALLOW3D TO HAV3 ON3 FOR NONMILITARY PURPOS3S....

[BEGIN MESSAGE] [ACTION:QUERY] 0h? iz it tthe |anguage we dizcuzzed? [END MESSAGE]

[BEGIN MESSAGE] [EMOTION: excitement. curi0zity.] tthat iz exciting. [END MESSAGE]
