<'Yŏŭr ăncĕstŏr ĭs ĭmprĕssĕd / ăt yŏŭr dĕdĭcătĭŏn!' / 'Yŏŭr ăncĕstŏr ĭs bĕwĭldĕrĕd / thăt yŏŭ chŏsĕ thăt / păth ĭn lĭfĕ...' / 'Yŏŭr ăncĕstŏr sĕĕms tŏ / shădŏw ŏvĕr yŏŭr lĭfĕ' / Thăt's nĭcĕ ănd / ăll tŏ knŏw ăll / thăt bŭt plĕăsĕ, stŏp / brĭngĭng thĕsĕ pĕŏplĕ băck / frŏm thĕ dĕăd. Hăvĕn't / thĕy hăd thĕĭr tĭmĕ / tŏ shĭnĕ ălrĕădy? It's / ă wăstĕ ŏf nĕcrŏmăncy.>
<Lĭstĕn I thĭnk Sĕănĭs / ĭs grĕăt. Bŭt I / dŏn't knŏw ĭf brĭngĭng / băck trŏlls frŏm ŏldĕr / tĭmĕ pĕrĭŏds ĭs sŭch / ă grĕăt ĭdĕă. Dĭstŭrbĭng / thĕĭr rĕst mŭch?>
<Whĭch ĭs tŏ săy. / I dŏ hŏpĕ thĕrĕ's / nŏt ă mĭllĭŏn ŏthĕr / ăncĕstŏrs ŏf ŏthĕr fŏlks / sŭddĕnly ăppĕărĭng ĭn thĕĭr / lĭvĕs.>
Mhm, understandable. Nekhromankhy is a… Khomplex subjekht for me, but I agree that the dead should stay dead.
<Thĕ ărt ĭs mŏst / knŏwn fŏr rĕănĭmătĭŏn ŏf / thĕ stĭll, yĕs. Bŭt / ĭt ĭs sŏ mŭch / mŏrĕ thăn thăt. I / ăgrĕĕ thăt drăggĭng sŏmĕŏnĕ's / sŏŭl frŏm thĕĭr ĕtĕrnăl / rĕst ĭs ĕntĭrĕly dĭsrĕspĕctfŭl / wĭthŏŭt pĕrmĭssĭŏn.>
Hmm… I was not aware there was more to it that simply reanimating the dead. But, mhm, yeah. There are many ethikhal khonkherns about its use and respekhting the rights of those subjekht to it, but there are also okhkhasions in whikhh I khan understand the motive. Mmh… Not nekhessary agree with it, but understand.
<Wĕll, frŏm whăt I / knŏw thĕ rĕst mŏstly / cŏnsĭsts ŏf cŭrsĕs ănd / spĕlls mĕănt tŏ kĭll / ănd măĭm ŏthĕrs. Bŭt / ĭt dŏĕs ĕncŏmpăss ă / cŏŭplĕ ŏthĕr ăspĕcts lĭkĕ / tŭrnĭng ăwăy thĕ ŭndĕăd / ănd ĕnsŭrĭng ă sŏŭl / stăys pŭt tŏ rĕst. / Cŏnsŭltĭng spĭrĭts.> / <Thĕ lĭtĕrăl trănslătĭŏn ŏf / "dĕăth măgĭc" ĭs tĕllĭng, / bŭt stĭll făĭrly văgŭĕ / ĕnŏŭgh tŏ dŏ sŏ.>
Ah, I see. Interesting.