======== UPD8 TO FINDINGS ======== #research #exposition8ooth #thesylphisin From what I can gather, the “Kull” and “Kult” markings appear to function primarily as a kind of social metric, an indic8tor of how a post is received rather than any formal system of ranking or authority. (See that when you search an Altern8te 8y their name that the Altern8te with the highest Kull score is not ranked the highest 8y score. “Kult” seems to align with approval or popularity, while “Kull” suggests the opposite, though I have yet to o8serve any reward or consequence tied directly to amassing large amounts of either direction. I am merely documenting my findings, so that those who come across these same questions in the future might have some point of reference regarding the inner workings of this platform. From what I have o8served, each comment on a post provides +5 Kult and +5 Kull. I do not 8elieve a post when cre8ted has any 8aseline points of this matter. It seems that engagement through the more “positive” quadrants does not reduce overal Kull you have amassed 8ut there is a higher ratio of positive engagement and vice versa ranked on replies themselves to show whether a post was seen as in favour or not to the general pu8lic. Not all quadrants carry equal weight in this setting. A heart equals +5 Kult points. A diamond +2 Kult points. A Clu8 +2 Kull Points and a Spade +5 Kull points. At this time, it does not appear a 'rechitt' alters either score.
"= rechitts should give. negative both. ok? do it now. ="
Personally I think it should 8e an indic8tor of a good post and should offer 15+ Kult points. Getting someone to 8e moved to the point of sharing it is a rather rare feat.
"= nah. popularity needs to be. punished. i think. ="