Is it so wrong for a girl to talk about Freud as her main psychological basis for her layman’s analysis? I know most of it is bullshit, but it’s more fun to imply Freudian things. This is not my career, it is simply my passion.
Also, nobody knows what anything else means. I cannot call something Watsonian. I get a bigger reaction name dropping Freud.
shouldnt name dropping things people dont get be more impressive my rose admitted sometimes she made names and shit up just waiting for someone to call bullshit on her despite her being right
Ah, being compared to alternates of myself, everyone’s favorite activity. It’s very circumstance based. For example, if I’m talking to Dirk, he’ll know what I mean so I can just discuss actual varied psychologists and philosophers. In terms of making things up, your Rose has made an obvious blunder if she plans on revealing that fact all over the place like she has to you. If I ever did something like that, I wouldn’t give up the game so easily. You’re also misunderstanding the purpose of analysis if you think the purpose is to come off as ‘impressive’. I’m already impressive. Wikipedia psychoanalysis has nothing to do with it.
impressive as in theyll listen to you more people than youd think know that freud is bunk also she didnt mean to tell me she was drunk sorry for the comparison i guess
They already listen to me. It’s not like I’m going to strangers on the street telling them I’ll fix their lives, you know.
aight ok my bad