Toifel Diskus
@apologistsTenet
Scho-lar. Phi-lo-so-pher. Pa-tron. Al-der-man-gler of Auf-ein-em-hü-gel. Al-ways o-pen to de-bate.
My re-spon-si-bil-i-ties as head of the cit-y coun-cil keep me 𝕢uite pre-oc-cu-pied; I would still like to con-tin-ue in-ter-act-ing with this web-site. Here is a 𝕢ues-tion: how would one go a-bout just-i-fy-ing pa-ci-fi-sm to the Em-pi-re? #Diskussionℚuestion
I ask, my fel-low Al-tern-i-ans: can char-i-ty e-ver be eth-i-cal? Why or why not? #Diskussionℚuestion
Does claim-ing woke-ness in-di-cate a lack of woke-ness? Can it e-ver be woke to claim the man-tle? #Diskussionℚuestion
I may as well join in on the to-pic at prong. Can kid-nap-ping e-ver be mor-al-ly just-i-fied? #Diskussionℚuestion
At what point does re-venge be-come ne-ces-sar-y, and why? #Diskussionℚuestion
Which ha-bit or act, if e-very-one al-ways held to it, would im-prove the un-i-verse the most? #Diskussionℚuestion
: hadnt real:zed : waz made to make zenze w:th zometh:ng az hypothet:cal az troll ext:nct:on, the mozt :mpozz:ble feat of all, conz:der:ng our mazz colon:zat:on acrozz our galaxy and many more. : doubt th:z would be the bezt :mprovement to everyone elze. :tz juzt me.
C:/Users/%adeptIngenuity%/just_in g3n3ral_if you know you know/Downloads
I sup-pose that is a val-id read-ing of "im-prove-ment". I did not spe-ci-fy whe-ther for the whole, for civ-il-i-za-tion, or for the in-di-vi-du-al. It calls in-to 𝕢ues-tion whe-ther the im-prove-ment for one can, or should, out-weigh an in-prove-ment for more than one. Both are giv-en their place in our so-ci-e-ty. I as-sume this mass ex-tinc-tion e-vent would in-clude you as well?
maybe my anzwer wouldve d:ffered had the zpec:f:cat:on been there. no b:g fuck:ng deal. but yeah. :t would :nclude me.
I find a bit of o-pen-end-ed-ness can lead to more in-ter-est-ing dis-cus-sions. I am cur-i-ous, does the val-ue of the im-prove-ment change whe-ther it is just you that dis-ap-pears as op-posed to ev-er-y-one? If so, by how much? #cw-suicide
you m:zread. :tz juzt me w:th th:z op:n:on. the hypothet:cal rema:nz. :t :z meant to ztretch to everyone. but letz zay :t :z juzt me. :t doeznt change. : prov:de noth:ng :n th:z world that my death would make for a drazt:c change or :mprovement on zoc:ety. #cw-zu:c:de
If it does not mat-ter whe-ther it is just you or all life, then it seems less like you came for the dis-cus-sion top-ic and moreso to share these fee-lings with anyone who will lis-ten.
not really. : dont g:ve a fuck. never za:d :t d:dnt matter. zoc:ety doeznt change.
I po-sit that the pop-u-lar dis-course on this web-site is lack-ing in sub-stance. There is a ten-den-cy to smo-ther that which does ap-pe-al to the sen-si-bil-i-ties of the mass-es. I am un-der no de-lu-sion that I a-lone can pro-per-ly ed-u-cate each and ev-er-y troll pre-sent on how to en-gage in a pro-per ver-bal - or text-u-al, as it were - spar-ring match, but it is my de-si-re that I may at least make for an ad-e-𝕢uate spar-ring part-ner. I am ta-ken by the be-lief that if one is un-a-ble to de-fend their stan-ces from e-ven the slight-est scru-tin-y then they are more like-ly to be-tray their be-liefs, their peers, and their cause when faced with less ab-stract re-sist-ance. For the sake of a more re-sil-iant troll-kind, I en-dea-vor to ap-ply the heat and pres-sure re-𝕢ui-red to trans-form or-gan-ic waste in-to dia-monds. I am an-ti-ci-pate man-y in-ter-est-ing dis-cus-sions.