An9nym9us says: "y9u pr96a6ly missed the n9nsense a69ut twink 96literati9n 6ut curi9us if y9u'd c9nsider y9urself a twink. i d9n't think s9, y9u're very hands9me. respectfully in a celi6ate way. #Twinks" N9, I w9uldn't c9nsider myself a twink. My understanding 9f the term twink is that it applies primarily t9 gay 9r h9m9sexual males, and as I am n9t attracted t9 men, 9r n9r attracted t9 any9ne at all, I am inherently exempt fr9m this s9rt 9f classificati9n. 6esides, if I had t9 pick 9ne, it'd 6e 9tter. 6ut m9st imp9rtantly, even if I were attracted t9 men, I reject the premise 9f categ9rizing 9neself in terms 9f 69dy shape 9r 6uild t9 6egin with. S9ciety needs t9 m9ve past the rhet9ric 9f judging 9ther pe9ple 6ased 9n their physical attri6utes. Particularly if 6eing a twink means getting "96literated". Alth9ugh I am missing the exact c9ntext 9f this statement, 96literati9n always carries negative c9nn9tati9ns, and I d9 n9t wish t9 su6ject myself t9 any s9rt 9f physical, mental, em9ti9nal, 9r figurative duress. #Twink96literati9n #Intrac9mmunitySlang #69dyImage #ThankY9uF9rTheC9mplimentTh9ugh #InACeli6ateWay #An9nym9us #QnA #KankrisAsk69x https://f9rms.gle/1mzxNi3S8sAc8Ter9
