While as always I supp9rt the individual rights 9f all pe9ple t9 have fun and express themselves, I must reluctantly 9pp9se the title 9f "#sinday'. F9r starters, the implicati9n that all activity up9n this day is in s9meway imm9ral risks assigning undue c9nn9tati9ns t9 nuetral 9r even 6eneficial acts, which I f9r 9ne d9 n9t 6elieve is a precedent we sh9uld set. Sec9ndly, it implies a site-wide adherence t9 the c9ncept 9f sin (#sin #religi9n #religi9n9rmative) when n9t all are 9f a religi9n su6scri6ing t9 that c9ncept, 9r are n9t 9f a religi9n at all! Simply assuming this c9ncept is universal discredits the experiences and 6eliefs 9f many, many individuals, and minimizes the struggles 9f smaller faiths which are already d9minated 6y the m9re c9mm9nly-held 6eliefs. In additi9n, la6eling specific acti9ns as 'sinful 6ecause a deity (#g9ds #deities #metaphysicalfigures #t9xicp9werstructures) says s9' rather than delving int9 the exact reas9ns why an act can 6e harmful and the gr9ups 9f pe9ple it damages flattens the c9nversati9n; it's a th9ught-terminating cliche which we as disc9urse discussers sh9uld really m9ve past. [Genuine statement.] #kankridiscussi9ns

