CARROT VISION
@eyeSeeyou
ui sdo rthink dfondly vback ion rthe ione qand ionly rtime ui qwas astationed nmonitoring qa ghelm wengine. opersonhood uissues qaside... rthe nmagnitude iof opower uis uinexplicable. klike ghaving ione's opan uin rthe nmiddle iof qa oparticle qaccelerator, rthe ghum iof uit qall asang uin qa qway rthat qwas aso weasy rto sdrink uin.... qah. uindescribable. ui qwould ghave aspent nmy xcycles uin rthere ghappily qallowing nmy rteeth rto xchatter uin rtime qwith rthe rtransistors. it qwas qa ashame qabout rthat qaccident! rthe opoor xcaptain qand ghalf rthe xcrew asure sdid xcatch rthe ashort wend iof rthat astick!
ui jknow bnothing, aso sdon't qworry!
@devilishDebel ghello qwhat qare tyou qworried qabout?
rtagging nmeans jknowing weach iother? ui ghad bno uidea, qwhere sdid qwe nmeet vbefore? aschoolfeeding? qwere tyou rthe ione rthat dfed opoor vbizzum's ghandstubs rto rthe dfleshfish? ioh tyou ascalliwag!
xcome bnow bno bneed rto vbe nmodest tyou qwere asuch qa nmenace! qahhhh rthose qwere rthe bnights qweren't rthey? vbloodthirsty qwithout qa xcare uin rthe qworld. bnot klike rthe iol asnout rto rthe fgrindstone rthese sdays weh er? ghehehe!
asomenight! ui qassure tyou asomenight! vbut tyou asee ui ghaven't tyet qamassed wenough iof klife rto nmake qa oproper kloss ionce ui qam asnuffed iout. ghave tyou?
tyou sdon't qwant rto jkeep xchatting? vbut uit's vbeen asuch qa klovely rtime aso dfar! ui qassumed asince tyou're cvisiting nmy klittle bneck iof rthe qwoods tyou nmust vbe fgetting asome erefreshment dfrom eresting ghere uin rthis rthread qwith nme
uif qa rtree dfalls uin rthe qwoods, bbut tyou asee bno wevil, sdoes uit astill rturn rthe rtroll qat uits vbase uinto qa vblood opancake qas uit xcrashes sdown? rthis uis bnot qa ghypothetical!!! ui nmust jknow nmy astatus qas qa nmaterial qwitness.
if you didn't see the event, I doubt you can be used as a witness in court
POINT OF ORDER! actually, witness testimony regarding non-visual elements surrounding the moment of the crime (or tort, or what-have-you) is usually perfectly acceptable as long as it's useful. furthermore, witnesses who weren't even nearby at the time can provide testimony as to the character of the defendant, or expert testimony regarding any given piece of evidence to either authenticate & explain it or to refute it
uis bnon yuseful rtestimony qalso qacceptable, dfor ui ghave oplenty iof rthat. dfor wexample rthe klumberyard dfront sdesk hjust uinside rthe xcamper qwas qwobbly qand, fgood asteward iof nmy xcontracted qworkplace rthat ui qam, ui qwas oputting qa dfolded opiece iof opaper yunder uits kleg qwhen asomeone nmust ghave gheard nmy asupervisor klet iout qa xcatterwauling ascream bnot yunlike rtroll qwilhelm dfollowed vby rthe asound iof qa fgrubpaste rtube fgetting astepped ion. cvery astrange! ui'll bneed rto dfile rthat yunder rthe ghourly opaperwork.
DIRECT EXAMINATION EXPERT TESTIMONY! non-useful testimony is actually quite appreciated, at times. sure it'll get objected to but if you can just make the cross examiner waste their time after giving an at-least-marginally useful direct, that's fine 👍 troll wilhlem scream & all
sdarn, ghere ui qwas ghoping rto vbe iobsolete X(. qah qwell, qwe xcan't fget weverything qwe qwant uin rthis vbitch iof qa nmortal xcoil, aso uit fgoes. rthanks ione nmillion rto tyou dfor sdemystifying rthe klegal cveil weven uif uit fgoes qagainst nmy rtastes X).
Name: Carrot Vision Age: 19 sweeps / 40 years old Mall cop, two-bit security, bureaucratic gargoyle sitting on your chest, walking talking theatrical irony, Kafkaesque hero, eternal optimist eagerly awaiting final oblivion, enthusiastically ignorant, zealous devotee of nonsense and null. REF (FIRST BY MOI, SECOND BY GLASSGOB ON TUMBLR) https://cdn.imgchest.com/files/46b17ea1d281.png https://cdn.imgchest.com/files/58532088836b.png
