i love how this argument is about what one is. (learl7 the mind pla7ers know whi(h is the better aspe(t in the mind-heart di(hotom7 #smug
I'm gonna have to also agree.
what do you mean "what one i$"
it wa$ about order of event$ really. i$ what i'm $aying. it wa$ a time ¢onver$ation. i maintain that.
it was about how mu(h of an influen(e the (lasspe(t has on one’s being, it seemed. how mu(h of one’s soul is taken up b7 that. that’s our domain. influen(ed b7 time, (ertainl7, but a heart matter. although i think i missed a response, i don’t know what that pemdas analog7 was referring to
it wa$ a lot of "¢hi¢ken or egg" talk i mean it kinda $eem$ to me that a lot of the a$pe¢t$ are ¢lo$er than they $eem. e$pe¢ially the "oppo$ing" one$. it make$ $en$e, really, i mean. if they're intrin$i¢ally linked, you ¢an't affe¢t one without affe¢ting the other. i don't think they're oppo$ite$ $o mu¢h a$ ¢ounterpart$. po$itive and negative $pa¢e, figure and ground. they under$tand heart ju$t a$ mu¢h a$ we do, in their own way
7eah, of (ourse. who 7ou are affe(ts what 7ou do and what 7ou do affe(ts who 7ou are. this wasn’t a serious post, haha.
no yeah i know you ju$t got me thinking. i've kinda been $truggling to wrap my head around the game me¢hani¢$ in general, but. i gue$$ $omething kinda ¢li¢ked ju$t now.
oh, well, in that (ase, i’m glad to have helped, inadvertentl7 or not! ever7thing’s (onne(ted with ever7thing else, be(ause ever7thing makes up all of realit7