READING ONTO THE RECORD! opposing counsel doesn't even object to hearsay anymore they just hit you with the 801(d)(2) stare
POINT OF ORDER! this is because statements that fall under 801(d)(2), which is to say statements made by a party opponent, are objectively not hearsay. but sometimes younger legislacerators will object anyways without realizing; it is useful to do yourself so if you suspect opposing counsel is weak & incapable of properly responding to even a flawed objection. this post is suggesting that opposing counsel has become less naive & more cynical, which neatly parallels "the descendant stare" memes about wrigglers these days.
RE: STATEMENTS THAT FALL UNDER 801(d)(2) [...] ARE OBJECTIVELY NOT HEARSAY! note that this is under 801, the rule that defines hearsay, rather than 803, the rule that details exceptions to it. (simplifying to a general audience, because i am polite)
Your£ lik£, so lik£, smart. Lik£, HAHA lik£, OMG. Lik£, ILY. <> ;] Lik£, SO MUCH.
CONFER WITH CO-COUNSEL! ᴹ:)
And also lik£, th£ funni£st ;]!!!!!