| Am Not Terr|bly Fond Of Gener|c |seka|. Of Course There's The Typ|cal Reasons Of Call|ng Them Tr|te, But My B|ggest Hang Up |s They Contr|buted To The Death Of The An|me R|val. Authors These Days Can't Handle The |dea Of The|r Prec|ous Ma|n Character Ever Be|ng Regularly Challenged For The Same Reason They Refuse To Have Any Support|ng Cast That |sn't A Flander|zed Woman That Has No Male Fr|ends.
DO NOT BLAME ISEKAI FOR THIS. THE BLAME ACTUALLY LIES ON A GENRE CALLED "PROGRESSION FANTASY." OF SOLO LEVELING INFAMY. A CURSED REALM THAT DARES TO ASK "WHAT IF INSTEAD OF PLOT WE JUST WATCHED THE MAIN CHARACTER'S NUMBERS GO UP?" THERE ARE PLENTY OF ISEKAI WITH HIGH-QUALITY RIVAL CHARACTERS. IN FACT WHEN I THINK OF THE IMAGE OF A "RIVAL CHARACTER" ONE OF THE FIRST THAT POPS INTO MY PAN IS BERN BUNNINGS FROM THE TOMINO-PENNED ISEKAI AURA BATTLER DUNBINE. DO NOT BLAME ISEKAI AS A GENRE FOR THE SINS OF AN UNRELATED GENRE. THAT JUTS HAPPENS TO BLEED ACROSS BOUNDARIES IF NOT CONTAINED PROPERLY. ALSO. I STRONGLY REJECT THE ASSERTION THAT "They Refuse To Have Any Support|ng Cast That |sn't A Flander|zed Woman That Has No Male Fr|ends" IS A REAL PHENOMENON. THAT SIMPLY DOESN'T HAPPEN.
You Know What, Very Rarely Do | Adm|t Fault, But You Are R|ght, | Am More Spec|f|cally Referr|ng To Progress|on Fantasy. Also You Could Red|rect My Secondary Assert|on And Remember The Word "harem" Ex|sts. There |s A Reason These Woman Are Somet|mes Also Slaves, And |ts Because Of |nsecur|ty And A D|sease |n The M|nd Of Troll And Man. |f You |mag|ne A Good |seka| That Goes Aga|nst The Tropes | D|scuss, You Can S|mply Assume |t |s Not Part Of The Slop | Desp|se.