♥︎ ♦ [12 POSTS YOU REGRET MAKING] ♠ ♣ Okay. Apparently helms hate it when you sympathize with them. My bad for thinking the Fleet wouldn't treat you like people. I'll make sure not to care next time.
<action; statement input; statement: he|ms do |ike that. it is just that your post was very easy to read as being in favour of he|m access to socia| media being restricted input; statement: especia||y when 1 is used to seeing such sentiment from highb|oods. input; statement: & to c|arify, you are correct in that the f|eet does not treat us as peop|e. a|so, it is very much against the ru|es for most he|ms. the 1s that can access it are very |ucky, & the f|eet is indeed very strict. he|ms who use socia| media are audited more thorough|y & more often than 1s who do not. />
♥︎ ♦ [10 JUSTIFICATIONS THAT JUST MISS THE MARK] ♠ ♣ It was a neutral statement. "I didn't know helms were allowed to use social media." It isn't my fault you chose to assume the worst and ignore every other comment I made in that thread outright calling the Fleet cruel. You might find people are kinder than you think when you stop looking for reasons to hate them.
<action; statement input; statement: i did not ignore the thread that fo||owed your post. i am agreeing with you... />
♥︎ ♦ [26 ODDLY UNSATISFYING RESPONSES HIGHBLOODS WON'T TELL YOU] ♠ ♣ All I received from you until this exact moment was an unambiguous negative reaction to the original post. Honestly, why do I even try to get along with people?
<action; statement input; statement: presumab|y you try to get a|ong with peop|e because you want connection, |ike pretty much everyone does. [emotion_detected: annoyance] input; statement: apo|ogies for answering that question. i know it was rhetorica| but my coding does not. input; statement: anyway. in my first rep|y to this post, i was just trying to exp|ain to you why i had a negative reaction. i un-hated the post when i read further down. />
♥︎ ♦ [30 TIMES RANDOM REPLACE FAILED YOU] ♠ ♣ Ugh. That headline doesn't even make sense.