>so ho=w= does “rage” exactly conceive itself as a po=w=er >=w=hat am i just angry >i =w=ant blood blob friends! >but i guess i’m stuck =w=ith fucking redistributing anger
[BEGIN MESSAGE] Y0u d0 n0tt wantt tthatt. [END MESSAGE]
>is there a blood blob me or am i just special in the =w=ay that i don’t have one because >i don’t kno=w= i can’t think of anything deepn
hone$tly mo$t of the a$pe¢t$ $eem like they ¢ould have been more aptly named. they like to get. punny. i've noti¢ed. like...rage i$ al$o tied to $anity? whi¢h i ¢an only a$$ume i$ a play on madne$$. mad. angry. rage. among the other thing$ it en¢ap$ulate$ too. idk i'm not really the per$on for thi$
SO. "RAGE" ALSO ENCOMPASSES "NARRATIVE FIAT" AND "VIOLATION OF NATURAL LAW." BY "REDISTRIBUTING RAGE" YOU BASICALLY COLLECT ALL OF THE RELEVANCE SAUCE IN ONE PLACE SO THAT YOU CAN FLAGRANTLY VIOLATE THE LAWS OF PHYSICS. IT'S LIKE A FANCIER VERSION OF THIEF OF LIGHT.

https://(hittr.ing/profile/bummelboogie/47bea2ef-4d2a-48a1-80a9-8ebbb389f0(3 wrote a thing

[BEGIN MESSAGE] [ACTION:QUERY] d0 y0u reca11 h0w zhe g0t 0urz? [END MESSAGE]

.png)
