Do §ome of you t(R)oll§ not have both a bulge & a nook? What (c)ould even be the pu(R)po§e of a unive(R)§e whe(R)e we don't have both e§pe(c)ially when we've got an Impe(R)ial M&ate to fu(c)kin (R)ep(R)odu(c)e with §omeone du(R)ing pailing §ea§on, & not being (c)ompatible §exually on a phy§i(c)al level with eve(R)yone would ju§t be too limiting. Like why the fu(c)k a(R)e you all fixated on "gi(R)l bulge" even? That'§ like §aying "gi(R)l elbow" o(R) "boy knee". O(R) a(R)e you ju§t §o dete(R)mined to §exualize a gi(R)l'§ body you have to do it nightly & (R)abidly like a b(R)oken (R)e(c)o(R)d. #n§fw I gue§§. ™
wELL, i WOULD NEVER BESMIRCH SOMEONE FOR, wHATEVER SET OF JUNK DOWN THERE, tHEY MAY OR MAY NOT HAVE, i MEAN, gENMAT IS, gENMAT, aNYWAYS, fOR THE SAKE OF REPRODUCTION, bUT, yEAH, oBJECTIFYING WOMEN, aND BEING WEIRD ABOUT WOMEN AND, rEDUCING WOMEN TO, tHEIR GENITALS, a WHOLE LOT, sURE IS A THING, tHAT HAPPENS A LOT, hUH? #NSFW
Yeah my majo(R) g(R)ipe i§ the §en§e of obje(c)tifi(c)ation that (c)ome§ with it. §:/ ™
yEAH, mAYBE US GIRLS, wHO ARE BEING SPECIFIED, wITH THAT, aRE MORE THAN JUST, tHAT PART OF US,
Yeah! And it'§ fu(c)kin' wei(R)d to be (c)on§tantly (R)efe(R)(R)ed to that way. I'm al§o e§pe(c)ially wei(R)ded out by the§e §uppo§ed "alien§" al§o hopping on the t(R)end? Like it ju§t make§ it feel way mo(R)e feti§hi§ti(c). ™