If .o°ne wished t.o° n.o°t discl.o°se .o°nes .o°wn c.o°l.o°r and n.o°t draw up.o°n attenti.o°n they sh.o°uld just use a different c.o°l.o°r n.o°t s.o°mething rand.o°m grey .o°r ne.o°n .o°r whatever I mean d.o°nt d.o° any .o°f that .o°r c.o°urse hem.o°faking is seri.o°us but c.o°me .o°n s.o° many times s.o°me greytext attempts t.o° relate t.o° me but it is hey y.o°u are just drawing negative attenti.o°n t.o° y.o°urself and then me by trying t.o° ass.o°ciate with me be better
the current negative c[]nn[]tati[]ns ass[]ciated with haem[]an[]nymity is the resu|t []f haem[]n[]rmative eXpectati[]ns that every[]ne sh[]u|d fa|| under the e|even-caste spectrum as []fficia||y defined by the empire t[] fa|| between shades []f burgundy t[] fuchsia. haem[]an[]ns wh[] cha||enge this eXpectati[]n are usua||y d[]ing s[] because they d[]n't want t[] be acc[]sted by the prejudices ass[]ciated with any particu|ar caste, which are preva|ent just ab[]ut anywhere y[]u |[][]k regard|ess []f whether []r n[]t y[]u think y[]u pers[]na||y c[]ntribute t[] th[]se prejudices. f[]r instance, if a highb|[][]d caste c|aimed being a br[]nzeb|[][]d, they w[]u|d then be subjected t[] treatment n[]rma|ised by s[]ciety as it pertains t[] the br[]nzeb|[][]d caste itse|f. by using a hue|ess shade instead, this rem[]ves any prec[]ncepti[]ns ab[]ut what caste the haem[]an[]n actua||y is, thus a||[]wing them t[] separate themse|ves fr[]m caste-specific prejudices, whi|e a|s[] bec[]ming the target []f this kind []f rhet[]ric trying t[] shame hue|ess haem[]an[]ns themse|ves. as it stands right n[]w, there is n[] situati[]n in which a haem[]an[]n can escape any kind []f prejudice, but at the very |east, using a hue|ess shade d[]esn't break any |aws ab[]ut impers[]nating an[]ther caste entire|y
.o°k I d.o°n't care ab.o°ut anh .o°f that it is b.o°thers.o°me when s.o°me.o°ne makes their pr.o°blems int.o° my pr.o°blems in a way that can get me culled in the w.o°rst circumstance s.o° d.o°n't be saying such things t.o° me actuslly please thank y.o°u
if y[]u're w[]rried ab[]ut p[]tentia| repercussi[]ns simp|y f[]r engaging in the same digita| space as a haem[]an[]n, y[]u can take steps t[] av[]id this by b|[]cking any haem[]an[]ns y[]u see []r wh[] attempt t[] interact with y[]u. it is n[]t acceptab|e, h[]wever, t[] eXpect []thers t[] change their []wn preferences, which are []ften a means []f se|f-preservati[]n, just f[]r y[]ur sake
dude dont you have better thiings to be doiing wiith your mouth liike serviiciing your betters or some shiit than goiing on long wiinded preachy diiatriibes about suckiing hemoanon bulge iinstead #nsfw
this is the sec[]nd time s[]me[]ne has made a vu|gar c[]mment ab[]ut my m[]uth []n this site. it speaks v[]|umes []f h[]w y[]u pe[]p|e resp[]nd t[] any kind []f inte||ectua| cha||enge []r debate. which is t[] say, y[]u can't hand|e it with[]ut trying t[] embarrass []r shame the []ther party int[] |eaving y[]u a|[]ne s[] y[]u d[]n't have t[] c[]me up with an actua|, inte||igent rebutta| []f y[]ur []wn. i w[]u|d rec[]mmend meditating t[] se|f-ref|ect []n why y[]u |ash []ut s[] readi|y when s[]me[]ne disagrees with y[]u []r tries t[] educate y[]u ab[]ut s[]mething y[]u were previ[]us|y ign[]rant []f. in fact, i w[]u|d even enc[]urage y[]u t[] fi|| []ut the referra| f[]rm |inked in my pinned p[]st if y[]u're interested in discussing th[]se s[]rts []f intr[]spective questi[]ns with a pr[]fessi[]na| (i.e. myse|f) in a safe, judgement-free envir[]nment. have a |[]ve|y night