@carmineGno+sio+lo+gy I will accept yo+ur apo+lo+gy, no+w. https://i.po+stimg.cc/vH6fZsMh/Screensho+t-2026-04-30-011614.png
I'll ap9l9gize when I have s9mething t9 ap9l9gize f9r. As it stands, this screensh9t (easily d9ct9ra6le, 6y the way, 6ut unlike s9me pe9ple I take y9ur acti9ns in g99d faith) d9es n9thing t9 change my 9pini9n 9r supp9rt y9ur argument. N9w, 6ef9re we c9ntinue, I must warn y9u that it is m9re than a little childish t9 expand such a min9r disagreement t9 9ur entire Chittr feed like this. If that is what y9u w9uld really like t9 d9, I w9uld n9t mind f9ll9wing suit, as I 6elieve in making space f9r pe9ple t9 express themselves h9wever they see fit n9 matter h9w pettily they ch99se t9 d9 s9, 6ut I w9uld als9 like t9 p9int 9ut that there was n9thing wr9ng with keeping 9ur c9nversati9n c9ntained t9 a single reply thread.
Childish? And here I was, trying to+ be po+lite and no+t clutter Karkat's activity feed. We sho+uld be respectful o+f o+thers, after all, and no+t mo+no+po+lize the space o+f o+thers, wo+uldn't yo+u agree? Is it petty, all o+f a sudden, to+ be aware o+f o+thers, and to+ no+t o+verwhelm them with a discussio+n they didn't ask to+ be a part o+f?
N9w wh9's speaking 9n 6ehalf 9f my dancest9r? If y9u cann9t even keep y9ur argument internally c9nsistent with y9ur 9wn 6ehavi9r, I must c9nclude that y9u have n9 argument t9 speak 9f and are 9nly pr9l9nging this in a paltry attempt t9 get a rise 9ut 9f me. Y9u kn9w h9w I hate t9 make assumpti9ns 9f r9mantic intent, 6ut if y9u are in need 9f an 9utlet f9r pitch attitude, I suggest y9u turn literally anywhere else.
... Really? Accusing me o+f pitch flirtatio+ns, with yo+u? https://i.pinimg.co+m/1200x/c8/d5/f1/c8d5f102fdedf1864bc6fa90371fcaa9.jpg
((i just want you to know i love your porrim and im so sorry about my kankri HAHAHAHA))
you're totally fine! i love how well you're writing Kankri. he's so infuriating! it's amazing!