@cornichon♤cquired would you like perh♤ps to dm? or to otherwise spe♤k? you ♤ppe♤r to be f♤scin♤ted, or ♤t the very le♤st, fix♤ted.
Was this truly neceſſary? Either way I am faſcinated, yes. You have a decent mind to put towards your typing plane.
lma∞ he d∞es that. that man l∞ves reacting t∞ p∞sts ab∞ve all else. 🙄✨
when one st♤nds in the heir♤rchic♤l position th♤t i find myself in, it oft behooves me to ♤muse ♤nd delight my superiors, even if doing so requires th♤t i mildly irk. i'm gl♤d to see you find my chits ♤n ex♤mple of ♤ decent thinkp♤n. it's ♤lso h♤rdly the highest figure i've h♤d to endure for notific♤tions. perh♤ps you ought to consider th♤t being thusly singled out is ♤ type of commend♤tion ♤ll its own?
Amuſe and delight you have. I have not yet ſpoken with a ruſt ſo directly and honeſtly in the digital landſcape, and it has been long ſince I have had the pleaſure of exchanging converſation flap to fin. I had aſſumed you meant to humiliate me, to which the conſequences ſhould have theoretically been rather grave, ſhallow or deep, land or ſea. I muſt concede here, though, I am pleaſantly ſurpriſed at the quality of your pleaſantries, and the pleaſantneſs of its contents therein. Perhaps you might treat me to more, in that ſwelteringly exotic ſhade of yours.
humili♤tion is not ♤ g♤me i intend to pl♤y with those undeserving of it. c♤tching your bulb is enough, for we've h♤d p♤sses before (perh♤ps ♤s ships in the d♤y?) on this site, though never enough to s♤ti♤te either of our hunger for convers♤tion, it would seem. you've dr♤wn my ♤ttention to ♤ g♤p in my knowledge, however, ♤nd th♤t is something i must now indulge. is crimson th♤t r♤re ♤ hue to find within the oce♤ns depths? there ♤re ♤ few pl♤nts th♤t offer such vibr♤nt ♤ hue on the surf♤ce, ♤nd of course the entire popul♤tion of rustblooded trolls, but my own knowledge of life bene♤th the w♤ves is l♤cking. i'd im♤gined there must be some m♤nner of redder life living perh♤ps in the truly d♤rk pl♤ces where pressure ♤nd w♤ter twist forms into the frighteningly l♤rge or unusu♤lly minuscule, bec♤use red blends so well into the d♤rkness. Of course, th♤t ♤ssumes the cre♤tures of the deep h♤ve vision th♤t oper♤tes in ♤ m♤nner simil♤r to we cre♤tures of the l♤nd. th♤t cert♤inly c♤nnot be the c♤se. in ♤ny c♤se, i've pr♤ttled ♤long here enough... perh♤ps too long? hi. i'm gl♤d you liked my posts.
Hello, Mademoiſelle Deupat, c’eſt un plaiſir. It ſeems you’ve caught my bulb, indeed, with a lure glittering ſo brightly here in the depths. What fair proportions you too poſſeſs, ſo very unſpoiled for a woman of ſuch a vulgar, riſky profeſſion. I would be remiſs not to mention it, you have a ſenſory plane which ought to be rendered in the fineſt of ochres. To anſwer your queſtion, though, yes red is a rarity, ſomewhat. I am a deep dweller, and while we do have quite a few red pigmented creatures, for the relative inviſibility this lends to them in the water column, where I am from there is no natural light to ſpeak of anyways. The creatures here are typically entirely un-melanated, and when they are colored it is typically ſome drab ſhade of grey only viſible near my floodlights. While I was hatched with ſome ſort of ſemblance of dark viſion uſeful enough to lend me ſight in the twilight zones of the open ſea, I have always relied on artificial lighting ſources mechanical or biological to light my hive and to encourage my ſenſe of ſight to remain developed. When there are on occaſion vividly colored creatures at theſe depths, they do tend to be of a ſtrikingly warmer hue, and I have always been fond of theſe occaſional curioſities, eſpecially by the vents. Though, the exotic nature of your viſage I had made comment on was leſs one of an ecological obſervation and more of a caſte-related one. To this date the loweſt I have ſpoken with on this ſite were muſtardbloods, and even that was a relative rarity to me juſt a few perigees ago. You are the loweſt I have ever ſpoken with at length, but here I am utterly faſcinated by the noble manner in which you conduct yourſelf. So here, the cultural exoticiſm is twofold.