<action; statement input; statement: head technician went digging through my code to find out why i have 'excess' troub|e with scans input; statement: he said that the scan modu|e coding wasn't meshing we|| with my synapses & processing centres. didn't fu||y 'take'. integration was interrupted when i misbehaved during insta||ation. so now it is having to rewire my pan the 'hard way' & pu|| more power to bridge the gap input; statement: he said it wi|| sett|e in time & input; statement: & he won't manua||y connect it now because that wi|| damage the synapses in a way that he does not want & wou|d 'increase the risk of its pan ma|functioning during scans & corrupting va|uab|e data' input; statement: at |east i am not in much troub|e since i have a|ready been punished for what i did during insta||ation. i am being a good pi|otbattery [#vio|ence #bodyhorror #body-horror] />
<action; statement input; statement: i was to|d that i wou|d just have to wait for it to fix itse|f input; statement: since tampering with the connection wou|d cause further issues />
:> Oh wh^t ^ brilli^nt move on their p^rt. P^h, I could do better with my n^notech. Much better. <:
<action; statement input; statement: i do not think they wou|d a||ow you to tamper with a he|m even if you cou|d do a better job input; statement: a|so i do not know if i'd want nanotech in my pan />
:> You’re legitim^te for th^t, though I extr^ct it ^fterw^rd; ^sk P^sc^l, I cle^ned their ports once. But I underst^nd. It just frustr^tes me how inefficient they ^re with you. <:
[BEGIN MESSAGE] ttzzzzhck. pah. fruztrating. but y0u are c0rrect. y0u are being g00d. y0u are ttrying z0 hard. and d0ing z0 we11. <> [END MESSAGE]
<action; statement input; statement: c|eaning ports is a bit different to rearranging the coding & neurons in my pan itse|f input; statement: i do not know that they are inefficient. i caused a |ot of issues for them & made their job about ten times harder than it shou|d be as they insta||ed me input; statement: & that misbehaviour is causing issues now that they cou|d not have prevented & that had a |ow chance of forming />
<action; statement input; statement: thank you pazcie input; statement: i am trying i am trying to be good />
:> It is. Which is why I underst^nd your hesit^nce. Perh^ps. But they should still h^ve better w^ys to fix it. Fighting is ^ n^tur^l response ^nd you ^re f^r from the first to do it. <:
<action; statement input; statement: it is a |itt|e unc|ear input; statement: but i think my system burned out the sedative quicker than expected. i shou|d not have been ab|e to fight />
:> Interesting. If highly unfortun^te. The one time when physic^l resilience is not in one’s f^vor. <: