@glitteringAcuity says: "DIRECT EXAMINATI9N TESTIM9NY! my questi9n and starement [sic] is "DIRECT EXAMINATI9N! why are y9u c9nstantly disrespecting tr9lls' First Imperial Indictment Privilege t9 free speech? READING 9NT9 THE REC9RD! asking pe9ple t9 restrict when they w9uld p9st certain su6jects, 9r t9 als9 include a warning when they d9 s9, is cens9rship." READING 9NT9 THE REC9RD! #TWCens9rship #TWC9ntarianism #TWStatusQu9Vi9lati9n #TWIsThisH9wTheseW9rkThisIsStupid #TWTheW9rdStupid #TWVagueAllusi9nT9TheC9ncept9fSex " I have n9thing against a tr9ll's right t9 free speech, and t9 frame y9ur argument in this way is disingenu9us, frankly. The right t9 free speech can 9nly 6e granted 9r taken away 6y a g9verning imperial 69dy, which y9u will find that I am n9t. T9 imply that I am engaging in acts 9f cens9rship implies that I have any legal 9r auth9ritative p9wer t9 rem9ve an9ther pers9n's g9vernment-granted rights. In d9ing s9, y9u paint me as an 9ppress9r class and 6est9w up9n me an am9unt 9f privilege that I d9 n9t p9ssess as an 9ffspectrum tr9ll. I am sure y9u d9n't mean t9, 6ut this attitude t9wards caste-atypical tr9lls such as myself plays directly int9 hem9casteist rhet9ric that depicts us as scape6leat6easts f9r anything wr9ng with s9ciety, simultane9usly influential en9ugh t9 enact great 9ppressive evils and inferi9r en9ugh t9 6e inherently deserving 9f unjust persecuti9n. S9, n9, me asking pe9ple t9 6e a little m9re mindful 9f the 9nline experiences 9f the pe9ple they share a platf9rm 6y *p9litely* requesting a limitati9n 9f NSFW matters is n9t cens9rship. It is simply me enc9uraging pe9ple t9 c9nsider 6etter curating their Chittr feeds f9r themselves and 9thers. #AndT9Y9urTags #N9 #ItIsnt #6utIAppreciateY9urValiantEff9rtN9netheless #Cens9rship #C9ntrarianism #StatusQu9Vi9lati9n #VagueAllusi9nT9TheC9ncept9fSex #Superflu9usTagging #KankrisAsk69x #QnA #Asks https://f9rms.gle/eYYh1W66k9t2PiAS7

