Ap9l9gies, 6ut n9t all 9f us can dr9p everything t9 engage in petty Chittr arguing. S9me 9f us have 6usy lives 9utside 9f s9cial media and cann9t aff9rd t9 spend every sec9nd 9f every h9ur glued t9 9ur screen 6reathlessly awaiting a resp9nse. #Vaguep9sting #6yTheWay #H9rn-SizeismIsntReal
Really, Kankri, yo+u wo+uld rather be vague and backhanded, rather than address me directly? I'm disappo+inted.
X Nah fuck your privacy, you posted this to a public timeline. x
D9 y9u enj9y 6eing 6latantly hyp9critical? 9r did y9u f9rget that I can see y9ur p9sts as much as y9u can see mine and that every9ne kn9ws y9u vaguep9sted me first f9ur h9urs ag9? I figured y9u were 9kay with this s9rt 9f 6ehavi9r s9 I am 9nly resp9nding in kind. I certainly h9pe y9u aren't h9lding me t9 a d9u6le standard. https://cdn.imgchest.c9m/files/96150118f64f.png
Well st9p that. And d9n't call me that. Y9u may c9me 6ack and talk t9 me when y9u're d9ne 6eing intenti9nally inflammat9ry. Until then, I will kindly ask y9u t9 st9p pushing my 6utt9ns, w9man.
Are yo+u trying to+ tell me what to+ do+, and insinuating that because I'm a wo+man, that I sho+uld do+ what yo+u say? Kankri, I'm sho+cked. I never wo+uld have taken yo+u fo+r o+ne to+ fo+llo+w in Cro+nus' fo+o+tsteps, and invo+ke sexist language like that. I o+nly call yo+u that as a to+nal inflectio+n and to+ sho+w that there's no+ ill will thro+ugh the use o+f a phrase o+f familiarity. And then yo+u go+ and call me 'wo+man', and insist that I'm trying to+ agitate yo+u o+n purpo+se... Quite frankly, I'm hurt by yo+ur wo+rds, Kankri.
Unless y9u've had a 6reakthr9ugh in y9ur gender identity that I have n9t yet 6een made aware 9f, I call y9u a w9man 6ecause that's what y9u are. Explain t9 me h9w that's inv9king sexist language. 9r, 6etter yet, if y9u take such 9ffense t9 it, perhaps we c9uld c9me t9 a c9mpr9mise. I am n9thing if n9t willing t9 acc9m9date my language t9 suit y9ur needs. If y9u st9p calling me 9verly affecti9nate pet names like "dear", I'll st9p calling y9u factually c9rrect things like "w9man."
No+. Yo+u so+und to+o+ much like Cro+nus, and I'm do+ne entertaining whatever this is fo+r yo+u.
9f c9urse, I sh9uldn't 6e surprised that y9u are unwilling t9 6ack up y9ur n9nexistent argument. Y9u admitted earlier that y9u are 9nly d9ing this t9 ann9y me at this p9int, and I regret letting myself get as invested as I have in whatever this is f9r *y9u*. As I said earlier, feel free t9 c9me 6ack and c9ntinue this c9nversati9n when y9u are d9ne with y9ur "teasing". Until then, I think it w9uld 6e wise f9r y9u t9 step away fr9m Chittr f9r the time 6eing.
I said I'm do+ne, Kankri. Please take 'sto+p' and 'no+' fo+r the answers that they are. Also+, as I to+ld a versio+n o+f yo+u o+n multiple o+ccasio+ns, and which I'm sure o+ther versio+ns o+f myself to+ld different versio+ns o+f yo+u, including yo+urself. Yo+u do+n't have the right to+ tell o+ther peo+ple what to+ do+. Least o+f all me. So+ sto+p it.