I'm n9t p9sting a wall 9f text, 6ut 6ecause I saw it and I was sn99ping 9n Cr9nus's (@/aeneasCaldarium) p9sts t9 get c9ntext f9r s9mething. I saw ee's (@/emptyEyes) p9st, and I agree with her. Generally, it is pretty wild that Cr9nus, wh9 has p9sted and tagged all his p9sts, gets m9re shit than a few jade harleys wh9 just p9st a69ut their UNTAGGED n9n-c9nsensual escapades. It's n9t a "Well, a w9man did it, and theref9re it's 6etter." It's a y9u all have a prec9nceived assumpti9n 9f Cr9nus Amp9ra and that y9u use that 6asis t9 act a certain way t9wards him (and his alts) When, 6y far, he's just 6eing ann9ying and h9rny. THIS IS N9T AN INVITATI9N T9 FLIRT 6Y THE WAY. I am just saying the hyp9crisy is pretty crazy. This isn't t9 say his acti9ns 9r the Jades are excusa6le; 6y n9 means d9 I agree with him 9r her. 6ut the we6site has rules; s9metimes they're n9t f9ll9wed, and f9r all the skeeve he has in the w9rld, he's tagging it at least. The 6are minimum, 6ut it's tagged. #nsfw #n9nc9n #du6c9n #nsfwe #hyp9crisy #suggestivec9ntent #nsfwc9ntent #directp9sting #vaguep9sting
Then this is n9t a69ut y9u. If y9u reread the p9st, my issue is that pe9ple are 6eing hyp9critical at Cr9nus f9r p9sting #du6c9n and tagging it when there are jades wh9 p9st a69ut #n9nc9n/#du6c9n and d9 n9t tag it. I was pretty clear a69ut what my p9st was a69ut. It is als9 in the we6site's rules t9 tag that c9ntent. S9 yes, I d9 have issues with that as well.
but you... dont have a problem with the actual abuse hes doing?
or the sexism?
or the murders that the jades are doing? just- just whether its tagged?
9h my stars and garters. It is tagged, it is n9t against the site rules t9 p9st it. He tags it, th9se tags can 6e 6l9cked. THE JADES ARE N9T TAGGING THEIR SEXUAL ASSAULT/RAPE AND A6USE 9F 9THER W9MEN. THAT IS MY ISSUE. ARE Y9U DULL? #nsfwe #du6c9n #n9nc9n What are y9u misunderstanding? There's l9ads 9f a6use c9ntent 9n this we6site tagged.
(( to be clear, this is kankri ic caring more about tagging than (ic) irl abuse, right? just wanna make sure in case this gets out of hand ))
(( Kankri's post outlines exactly what she is talking about, because the post had nothing to do with abuse content or IRL abuse. It's about untagged nsfwe content that she outlined in her post; she is not talking about IRL abuse because she is not a real person.
(( no i know, but irl *to her* i mean. like, diegetic ))
// I feel as if you are trying to take her post and replies in bad faith. She did not agree with or approve of the content Cronus was posting because the post was about people being angry about Cronus's posts (which he has tagged and can be blacklisted), but it is totally fine when Jade makes the same stuff untagged and cannot be picked up by a blacklist. This had nothing to do with Kankri's personal opinions about abuse and sexism because it's about NSFWE content within the guidelines of the website. What Jade brought up is completely unrelated to what Kankri is talking about in this post. If she wanted to talk about sexism and abuse, she would have. This post is about the hypocrisy of 2 people based on their already known identities.
// Actually, 6ecause 9f the IC/99C 6lur I am g9ing t9 6l9ck y9u. have a nice day.