@CARMINEGNOSIOLOGY EXPLAIN YOURSELF AT ONCE. #QUADSMEARING #RAILSWITHPAILS #PALEINFIDELITY #INFIDELITY #GOODOLDFASHIONEDCHEATING #PALEORGY #PALEPLAY #SUGGESTIVE.
I've 8een curious a8out that, now that you mention it. Your work, that is. If you'd like to meet sometime, do let me know!!!!!!!!
I can't imagine what is s9 sh9cking t9 y9u a69ut this, 6esides y9ur unending c9mmitment t9 interpret me in the w9rst faith p9ssi6le. It's alm9st impressive the lengths y9u will g9 t9 twist s9mething c9mpletely inn9cu9us. #PaleInfidelity? Really? Have y9u 6een talking t9 Cr9nus? 6ecause apparently I must assure y9u, as I assured him, that I d9 n9t end9rse #Infidelity in any way. 6ut it seems I need t9 make my stance clearer. If y9u w9uld take a m9ment t9 refer t9 my pinned p9st again (9r, I assume, f9r the first time), y9u might n9tice that I identify as quadrant agn9stic. #QuadrantAgn9sticism, f9r any9ne reading this wh9 might 6e curi9us (which I w9uld h9pe includes y9u as well, Damara), is a phil9s9phy which seeks t9 questi9n and dissect the rigidity 9f the quadrant system as it's 6een taught t9 us. I, and pe9ple like me, 6elieve there is n9 inherent reas9n t9 maintain the artificial status qu9 9f #All9Quadr9n9rmativity that has 6een thrust up9n 9ur s9cieties, and that 6y f9rcing 9urselves int9 such 69xes, we are d9ing a disservice t9 the true spectrum 9f r9mance fluidity that can and d9es exist am9ng tr9lls. Frankly, I am surprised y9u aren't already familiar with the c9nceit 9f quadrant agn9sticism, given y9ur 9wn hist9ry 9f taking 9n multiple partners in unsancti9ned c9nfigurati9ns. C9nsider the f9ll9wing as an example 9f just 9ne 9f many inherent c9ntradicti9ns 9f the allegedly neat and tidy delineati9ns 6etween quadrants. Any healthy kismesisitude keeping within the 69unds 9f an expected, traditi9nal 6lackr9m relati9nship inv9lves an implicit, if n9t explicit, agreement 6etween tw9 parties n9t t9 cr9ss any uncr9ssa6le 69undaries. There is an in6uilt expectati9n in any (again, healthy) stygian rivalry t9 6e mindful 9f a partner's limitati9ns when it c9mes t9 h9w much physical, mental, 9r em9ti9nal anguish 9ne can inflict up9n the 9ther. 6y even all9wing an9ther tr9ll (9r tr9ll-identifying pers9n, n9n-tr9ll identifying pers9n, 9r n9n-tr9ll identifying n9n-pers9n) t9 griev9usly injure y9u (general y9u) while expecting them t9 keep t9 their w9rd and n9t 9utright murder y9u, y9u are a putting a deep am9unt 9f faith in their pers9nal integrity. In an9ther w9rds, any healthy kismesisitude requires trust. 6ut is trust n9t an em9ti9nal typically ass9ciated with pale-aligned affecti9n? C9nsider als9 that healthy kismesisitudes are driven 6y the desire t9 see impr9vement in 9ne's partner. What material difference is there in the em9ti9ns experienced 6etween a kismesis 9r what 9f the m9irallegiances in which 9ne's partner 6elieves the 6est way t9 quell their rage is thr9ugh mutually c9nsensual 69dily harm in a way that w9uld 6e unfulfilling with a kismesis? 9r the 9mnidirecti9nal auspisticisms in which all three leaves have red-tinted feelings f9r 9ne an9ther and yet understand that any 9ne-9n-9ne pairing 9f the parties inv9lved w9uld 6e t99 t9xic t9 maintain, hence the need f9r a clu6ship? Sh9uld these pe9ple 6e f9rced t9 6reak 9ff their existing relati9nship style, 9ne that already w9rks f9r all mem6ers inv9lved and is n9t hurting any 9f them, in 9rder t9 imitate reductive quadrant stere9types that will leave them unsatisfied at 6est and actively resentful 9f their partners at w9rst? I think n9t. All 9f this is with9ut even menti9ning the existence 9f p9lyquadr9mantic individuals wh9se 9rientati9ns preclude them fr9m 6eing satisfied with 9ne pers9n in 9ne quadrant, 9r having 9ne quadrant attri6uted t9 9ne pers9n. (N9te the semantic difference, as the f9rmer refers t9 having 9ne 9r m9re pers9n in a quadrant at a time, while the latter refers t9 having 9ne pers9n fulfill tw9 9r m9re quadrant style relati9nships at a time). #Vacillati9n, als9 kn9wn #EthicalN9nm9n9quadrantism 9r #QuadrantSmearing as y9u s9 crassly put it, is an incredi6ly c9mm9n practice am9ng y9unger generati9ns 9f pr9gressive, li6erated tr9lls wh9 d9 n9t feel s9 6eh9lden t9 their predecess9rs' narr9w ideals 9f what a "pr9per" quadrant sh9uld 6e. And as l9ng as all parties inv9lved are aware 9f the exact parameters 9f their relati9nship style and have c9nsent fr9m 9ne an9ther t9, then n9, I d9n't see any pr96lem with a c9nciliat9ry relati9nship inv9lving any num6er 9f pe9ple. #Hyp9theticals #QuadrantAgn9stic #R9mance #R9manceMenti9n #R9manceFluid #P9lyquadRelati9nships #PanquadRelati9nships #9mniquadRelati9nships
HHHIIJJUSTGOTB LOOD ALL OVERMY PALMHUSKKAND BODY AND CLOTHES ANDFLOOR. GOMEN.
INNEEDA MOMENT. #MULTIQUADDING #QUADSMEARING #POLYQUADDING #OMNIQUADDING #PITCHPALE #REDCLUBS???? #HHHH
PLEASE DM ME. OR SHARE YOUR LOCATION ON ENCOUNTER ENEMIES. SO THAT YOU CAN EXPLAIN THIS TO ME AGAIN. IN PERSON. AT LENGTH. OBVIOUSLY WE HAVE MUCH TO DISCUSS. IN TERMS OF BEING ALLERGIC TO DOING QUADRANTS THE NORMAL WAY. LIKE THE REST OF THE SHEEPLE.
There is s9 much wr9ng with what y9u've just said here, I have t9 w9nder what it is a69ut tr9lls like y9u and Damara that make y9u s9 determined t9 paint me in such a needlessly negative light. F9r starters, I shudder t9 think 9f what is wr9ng with the Kankris y9u've met in the past t9 make y9u s9 unwilling t9 6elieve that I c9uld 6e s9 9pen-minded. Unf9rtunately, it is a c9mm9n 9ccurrence that I am all t99 familiar with, 6ut a disheartening 9ne n9netheless. The 9nes here 9n Chittr certainly leave a l9t t9 6e desired. Were I a tr9ll with a much larger eg9, I w9uld assume that I am the 9nly shining example 9f a pr9per Kankri left. Thankfully, 6eing as 9pen-minded as I am, I've c9me t9 accept that n9t every iterati9n 9f tr9ll that ass9ciates themself with me can 6e as c9mmitted t9 pr9gressivism as I am. Y9u w9uld d9 well t9 n9t lump me in with the 9thers. Sec9ndly, and 9n a related n9te t9 my first p9int, please d9 n9t imply a pale relati9nship 6etween Damara and me, 9r 6etween any9ne and me, f9r that matter. As I am quite likely 9ne 9f very few Kankris in parad9xspace still h9lding steadfast t9 his v9w 9f #Celi6acy, I supp9se just this 9ne time I w9n't fault y9u f9r making the assumpti9n that I might 6e 9ne 9f the 9nes wh9 has all9wed himself t9 succum6 t9 temptati9n. 6ut make n9 mistake, I have n9 interest in m9irallegiance whats9ever, least 9f all with Damara. Take a m9ment t9 c9nduct s9me pr9per research int9 my pr9file and y9u will see that I have sp9ken quite extensively a69ut my 69undaries, and will c9ntinue t9 d9 s9 in the future. Thirdly, and I can't 6elieve I even have t9 address this, 6ut even *if* I were in a m9irallegiance (again, never g9ing t9 happen), I w9uld never st99p s9 l9w as t9 cheat 9n my partner. #PaleInfidelity (a tag I have used far t99 many times n9w in the past few days al9ne) is a seri9us 6reach 9f the expected tenets 9f a relati9nship, and I am far t99 upstanding 9f a citizen t9 ever d9 s9mething like that. Especially t9 any iterati9n 9f Damara, as s9me9ne with a l9ng, t9rrid hist9ry 9f having 6een cheated 9n and wh9 is still dealing with the resulting trauma 9f her partner's unfaithfulness. Damara and I are g99d acquaintances, perhaps even friends if I wanted t9 g9 that far, and I w9uld *never* d9 anything t9 intenti9nally trigger her. H9pe this helps. #Assumpti9ns #Judgements #Celi6ateLifestyle #AlternateSelvesMenti9n #CheatingMenti9n #ImpliedRufi9hMenti9n #H9peThisHelps
I'M NOT DEALING WITH ANY TRAUMA. DELETE THIS NOW.
Th9ugh I disagree with y9ur use 9f the w9rd sheeple (and cauti9n y9u against using it in the future, as it implies pe9ple are incapa6le 9f thinking f9r y9urself), I d9 appreciate y9ur willingness t9 learn m9re. I'll 6e sending y9u a message sh9rtly.
OH STOP. I CAN SAY IT. I'M LITERALLY A SHEEP.
Hello, Kankri. First off, I would like to call attention to the fact that you didn’t greet me properly at any given point of your chitt addressed to me. Not only does it come off as dismissively aggressive of me as an independent variant of the troll you know, it also shows a lack of respect to my person, for neither of us has spoken to the specific self of the other. However, to show that all of my future o8servations are made in good faith, I will do my 8est to tag this message as accurately as I can. Ahem. #Aggressive8ehavior #DismissalOfGivenNames #ImpoliteInteraction #AraneaSerketVariants #AraneaMention #KankriMention #ProperUsageOfTags Now, moving on to all of the erroneous assumptions you’ve made in the span of however long it took you to write that out. You claimed that I, alongside Damara, have a shared goal of painting a negative image of you. Not only is this inaccurate, as you only have one singular comment from me that detailed my past experience with the Kankri from my timeline, it’s also presumptuous. I will not touch 8ase on if this rings true for Damara, as I can only speak for myself, 8ut it felt worth mentioning, as you said, and I quote, “trolls like you and Damara”. If you need further explanation, I use this word to highlight that you’re implying you know me personally, intimately, past the surface level that only a forgotten comment in someone else’s chitt can give. We 8oth know this is fallacious and 8orders on defamation, as this is our very first interaction on chittr dot ing, as I have already mentioned. “Trolls like you” has a negative connotation to it, and I would appreci8it if you no longer employed this language when referring to me. I do not need to explain why this is so; you’ll have to forgive me for 8ringing this up, 8ut I have on good authority that many disa8led, genetically mutated, queer-identifying, aged, hemoanonymous, non-conforming trolls would feel deeply offended and triggered 8y it. As someone who checks off a couple of this 8oxes, I highly encourage you to revise the historical usage of that particular phrase. #Assumptions #InaccurateDepictionsOfSelf #Fallacies #DefamatoryStatements #Defamation #DamaraMention #ChittrMention #SocialMediaMention #Disa8ility #GeneticalMutation #QueerIdentities #Ageism #Hemoanonymity #NonConformity #OffensiveLanguage Let’s unpack the rest of your comment. To quote you, the phrase “I shudder to think of what is wrong with the Kankris you've met in the past” is something that others could interpret as self-loathing, a triggering yet unfortunately common theme in everyday life. It’s of note that you’re making assumptions a8out me again, in this case, the assumption is that I have met a myriad of your alternates, which you have no way of knowing. When you think a8out it, it’s highly insensitive of you to assume there is something wrong with the one I know the most, the one from my timeline. Why? 8ecause you’re disrespecting his right to have a different opinion from yours, regardless of the thought process that ultimately leads to your judgement finalizing on you having the final word on whose is correct. I would like to kindly remind you that you are not aware of the intricacies that make up the inner workings of my timeline, nor are you aware of its sociopolitical climate, including 8ut not limited to: education, geology, geography, economics, socioeconomics, religion, acting government, etcetera. As such, you have no insight a8out the “you” that exists in my world and what personal experiences he could’ve gone through to shape his opinion on quadrants, which is the initial topic. You also mentioned progressivism, and again, no one can 8ase off one’s entire personality on their views on quadrants. Furthermore, if there were indeed something “wrong” with the troll that he is today, it would 8e discourteous of you to mention it when he isn’t present to defend himself on that matter. #TriggeringLanguage #Self-Loathing #Implications #Insensitivity #DivergentOpinions #AlternateTimelines #SocialPoliticalThemes #Education #Geology #Geography #Economics #Socioeconomics #Religion #ActingGovernment #Quadrants #AlternateSelves #KankriMention #Progressivism I do apologize for wrongly assuming that there was a pale 8ond 8etween the two of you, 8ut I will highlight that my initial comment expressively remarked on my lack of understanding and requested clarification on Damara’s chitt. I will make a note of your commitment to your vow of celi8acy, and no comment on it any further. I am glad, however, to 8e made aware that the two of you share a positive relationship. It’s always a good thing to hear. #Apology #Celi8acy #Celi8ateLifestyle #VowOfCeli8acy #PastRelationships #PositiveRelationship #MoirallegianceMention #PaleQuadrant To finish this off, I will take the time to request that you review the contents of my response in whatever capacity you see fit whenever you’re availa8le; it could 8e 8eneficial for any future interactions 8etween the two of us. #ContentReviewRequest #FutureInteractionMention Have a good light.