chittr

nø øne wants tø accept that prøcreatiøn is an inherently selfish act. yes, even if øne's species were øn the brink øf eradicatiøn. trølls. humans. stranger beings. nøt a øne øf us whø subjugate nature tø øur will øccupy a place øf necessity in any envirønment. quite the øppøsite. there is nø inherent need før øur kind tø perpetuate itself save før the inherent drive tø persist and spread. a mandate even the humble virus will følløw. but we are nøt creatures øf instinct aløne. we chøøse-- and thøse øf yøu whø chøøse øf yøur øwn vølitiøn, and nøt a mandate passed døwn by thøse whø stand abøve yøu, chøøse because yøu want sømething øut øf the act. what is it? a new existence tø serve as "prøøf" øf a bønd? a yøung mind tø shape in yøur image? a legacy? løve, uncønditiønal ør øtherwise, tø give ør receive? but the møment that new being begins tø exist, it is øut øf yøur cøntrøl. it may endure great suffering. it may grøw far beyønd what had been wished øf it. is that price wørthwhile?