DIRECT EXAMINATION! how many hearsay exceptions can YOU find in the following statement made by my witness? answers will be posted tomorrow! FWD: TESTIMONY! "...Th@t's when the defend@nt's employee told me: Doctor, ! Th!nk !'m Dy!ng." #law
~Present sense, cO~uld be argued t~O be an excited utterance, then existing medical/physical c~OnditiO~n, statement fO~r a medical diagnO~sis, maybe dying declarati~On? And maybe mO~re but I d~On't feel like lO~O~king up an~Other s~Ource~
♯ f⨂ur. i think. fucks sake i d⨂n't get paid en⨂ugh t⨂ be gettin quizzed ⨂n this shit i just m⨂ve papers ar⨂und
CONFER WITH CO-COUNSEL! ding ding ding! we have a winner! (though of course this is a trick question, since as an employee of the defendant - who we are referring to as *the defendant* rather than by name since we are on either prosecution or plaintiff, anything they would have to say is automatically a statement made by a party opponent & therefore categorically not hearsay). you got them all though!! ᴹ:D
~Was wO~ndering h~Ow that'd c~Ome up. Neat!~
READING ONTO THE RECORD! i don't expect you to actually be interested in a position at Hallowen & Co. or anything but you're cool so you're invited if you are
~Can I set sO~mething ~On fire~
DIRECT EXAMINATION EXPERT TESTIMONY! established precedent is that fire is only on the agenda during book club, but i would be amenable to revising current policy SIDEBAR OUTSIDE EARSHOT OF THE JURY! If you would rather set things on fire than argue in courtblock there are a few very obnoxious firms I would pay h&somely to have taken off the docket, as it were.