SIDEBAR OUTSIDE EARSHOT OF THE JURY! i just don't know how i'll know when i've earned the Friend of Chchow badge...
You shall know when you have spilled bllood in her name.
POINT OF ORDER! WAIT THAT'S EASY I CAN GET THAT DONE LIKE TOLIGHT
Go, my student. And kill for very llittlle reason at all
OBJECTION! ...i don't see you sporting the badge in question, actually. i have no problem with wanton violence for very little reason but VOIR DIRE! how are you fulfilling the prongs of 702(b-d) here. what are the facts or data, the gold-st&ard-in-your-field principles & methods, & the explicit assertion that the latter were applied RELIABLY to the former!!!
I am 500 sweeps olld. What??? I do not have the badge due to the fact that I do not llike asking for badges. It pllucks at my high-strung nerves.
OBJECTION! under Imperial Rule of Evidence 401 evidence is only admitted if such evidence makes the fact in question more or less probable; it is my assertion now that being 500 sweeps old does not meaningfully preclude the defendant from knowing how to read, thus not actually making the fact in question more or less probably. furthermore i object under rule 404(a)(1), evidence of a person's character trait (i.e. "being old") is inadmissible to determine a person acted in accordance with that trait (i.e. "was confused"). finally, i also object under rule 601, which is to say witnesses must be competent to testify; if the defendant truly can't follow the train of logic (regardless of alleged senility) they must step down from the st&.
DISCLAIMER! SORRY I DON'T ACTUALLY. HM. I believe you are friends with Chchow & would like to be friends with you also
xx_WHAT!!!_ZOMG_TRYCKS_YUO_COULD_ASK_4_IT_NOW_IF_YUO_WANT_x))_I_LUV_SEEING_YUO_IN_MY_NOTIFS!_xx
CONFER WITH CO-COUNSEL! YAYYYYY