@can9nC9ntri6ut9r D9 y9u have permissi9n fr9m the su6jects 9f y9ur #Headcan9n chitts t9 6e p9sting a69ut them? If n9t, I w9uld like t9 9ffer y9u a friendly suggest t9 rec9nsider the f9rmat 9f y9ur acc9unt t9 ensure y9u are 9perating as respectfully as p9ssi6le. 9therwise, the idea 9f accepting an9nym9us "headcan9ns" 9f 9ther pe9ple (which, if we are 6eing h9nest, is n9thing m9re than an excuse t9 make 6aseless accusati9ns 9f 9ther users and play pretend with their sense 9f self) c9mes 9ff as highly invasive, a little creepy, and even detr9llanizing, as it is 9utright implying that 9ther users are n9thing m9re than playthings 9nt9 which 9thers can pr9ject their th9ughts. #FriendlySuggesti9n #LetsKeep9urC9mmunitySafe
MO PERMISSIONS MO PROBLEMS [fORM IN PINNED]
c< tHey Have perMissiON frOM Me! >c
I’m sørt øf in agreement here, especiałły after seeing sø many different iteratiøns øf the same trøłłs in øne płace. It just seems łike an easiły-abused methød øf øutsøurcing øne’s persønał quałms tø a much łarger audience and spreading misinførmatiøn in the prøcess.