Ending with a bang on @scratchDoctor. Turnabout's fair play. ๐ Whether, according to the prevailing ethical, legal, philosophical, and psychiatric standards applicable to an omniscient and functionally omnipresent individual, it can reasonably be considered immoral, predatory, voyeuristic, manipulative, coercive, invasive, or otherwise improper for said individual to possess complete and involuntary knowledge of another persona's private correspondence, romantic inclinations, sexual interests, humiliations, insecurities, medical concerns, family history, formative traumas, concealed resentments, sleeping habits, personal rituals, precise physical location, future relationships, eventual causes of death, and numerous intimate details which that person has neither volunteered nor consented to disclose, provided that the individual in question did not acquire this information through surveillance, trespass, interception, deception, coercion, unauthorized access, or any comparable act, but simply knows it as a necessary consequence of his nature; and furthermore, whether occasionally demonstrating possession of such information during ordinary conversation can properly be described as an abuse of power when those demonstrations are generally relevant to the matter at hand, factually accurate, delivered in a civil tone, and frequently intended to guide the subject toward an outcome which the omniscient party already knows to be necessary, beneficial, unavoidable, or some combination thereof. \></ Good night, Chittr. Remember to respect your ecto elders. #GoregleWrapped
STUPID FUCKING QUESTION. TCH.
Unfortunately, should have seen that one coming.