#CAGTTL #NSFW #Casteplay #GillGrabbing #Reclamatio+n #BackByPo+pularDemand @handMaid @aeneasCaldarium In re: CAGTTL Part 12: Damara Megido+ O+nce again, let's take this paragraph by paragraph. Cro+nus immediately gets po+ints fro+m me by having the subject o+f his guide, in this case Damara, as his co+-autho+r. I'm always a suppo+rter o+f wo+men having co+ntro+l o+f their o+wn narratives. I just kno+w the respo+nse to+ this series wo+uld have been o+verwhelmingly mo+re po+sitive if mo+re o+f the wo+men in questio+n had had a chance to+ o+ffer their o+wn input. (And I'd lo+ve to+ hear mo+re abo+ut this co+ntraptio+n.) It's really sad to+ hear yo+u bo+th are so+ dismissive o+f "no+rmie" Damaras, as yo+u put it. Unsurprising, really, given the co+-autho+rs o+f this entry. Still, my experiences with no+rmie Damaras have been no+thing but pleasant. I can't attest to+ the validity o+f her free use kink, but getting high and co+mmiserating with her is always fun even witho+ut the expectatio+n o+f sex. That's fun to+o+, but yo+u are really missing o+ut if that's the o+nly thing yo+u want fro+m her. Damaras o+f all types have a *lo+t* to+ say, and even the o+nes stuck in their emo+tio+nal malaise have a pretty sharp to+ngue if yo+u bo+ther to+ listen to+ her. Mm. Here's where I'll defer to+ Cro+nus and Damara. Playing o+n caste stereo+types thro+ugh the lens o+f sex just do+esn't do+ it fo+r me. While there *is* merit to+ taking back dero+gato+ry language and wearing it with pride, I always questio+n what it is that the perso+n po+rtraying the o+ppresso+r-class gets o+ut o+f it aside fro+m a chance to+ freely o+ppress so+meo+ne they view as their inferio+r with no+ co+nsequences. Unless so+meo+ne is a very, very go+o+d acto+r, I can't be co+nvinced that the highblo+o+d in this scenario+ do+esn't truly internalize the prejudiced mindset that he po+rtrays in scene. And I can't say I've ever tho+ught Cro+nus to+ be a very go+o+d acto+r. But as lo+ng as the two+ o+f them co+nsent to+ the kink and are aware o+f the risks inherent to+ it, well, who+ am I to+ judge. #RACK O+h, and "damara vwants to+ mentio+n that they may as vwell be pirates vwith all the pegging they get up to+". I have no+thing mo+re to+ add to+ this, I just want to+ say that it made me laugh. Can co+nfirm. Actually, real quick, I want to+ address the term "pro+per nympho+ so+cio+path(s)". So+, yes, I kno+w Damara had a lo+t mo+re input than the o+ther wo+men featured in these guides did, and as such I do+n't want to+ co+me do+wn to+o+ hard o+n the language being used here, as I do+ understand the po+wer o+f reclaiming. But I want to+ highlight these in particular. Imagine me sighing really lo+udly. Imagine me ro+lling my eyes. Imagine me pinching the bridge o+f my no+se in exasperatio+n. Do+ yo+u ever no+tice ho+w men talk abo+ut wo+men who+ like sex? I mean, ho+w they *really* talk abo+ut wo+men who+ like sex. Just co+mpare this sectio+n to+ what is said abo+ut no+rmie Damaras, fo+r example. *Tho+se* sluts are bo+ring because they're to+o+ inactive, but *these* sluts are crazy because they're to+o+ assertive. It's an impo+ssibility. No+t much I can say abo+ut the lawyer-redacted sectio+n. The Damara-redacted sectio+n, ho+wever... after having spo+ken to+ the wo+man o+f the ho+ur myself, I can co+nfirm this as well. Including the gill-grabbing. Maybe especially the gill-grabbing. To+ that I say, mo+re po+wer to+ her. #ISuppo+rtWo+mensRights #AndWo+mensWro+ngs
WOULD YOU SUPPORT ENGAGING IN WOMEN'S WRONGS TOGETHER. FOR MALE ATTENTION. OR OTHER REASONS.
Go+sh, Damara, I do+n't kno+w. Do+ *yo+u* think I enjo+y do+ing things fo+r male attentio+n? Female attentio+n, ho+wever? No+w we're talking.
point of order, its actually quite simple to me. dolorosa-vwhore complex, i mean. i lowve vwhores! my problem vwith the boring damaras aint that theyre prudes though, its that theyre vwhores, but boring about it. othervwise, right on the money babygirl, reading me like a book owver here. #nsfvw #cagttl
Yuck. Yo+u keep almo+st endearing yo+urself to+ me and then immediately ruining it. I do+n't kno+w which is wo+rse, calling Damara a who+re o+r calling me babygirl. (Who+re is wo+rse, o+bvio+usly. But I'm no+t fo+nd o+f the infantilizatio+n either.)
cmon, she lovwes it! vwhats vwrong wvith a gal being sexually liberated?