♦ pitied by @inlihtanEruditus
And hΦw wΦuld ψΦu prΦpΦsΣ I acquirΣ thΦsΣ rΣsΦurcΣs withΦut first gaining thΣ suppΦrt Φf thΦsΣ whΦ wΦuld prΦvidΣ thΣm tΦ mΣ? It's quitΣ naivΣ and shΦrt-sightΣd tΦ ΣxpΣct thΣ changΣs I ΣnvisiΦn tΦ happΣn ΦvΣrdaψ, dΦn't ψΦu think? RΣvΦlutiΦn wΦn't happΣn withΦut bΣliΣf in its causΣ. NΦbΦdψ can takΣ thΣ first stΣp fΦrward withΦut first having thΣ cΦuragΣ tΦ facΣ thΣ unknΦwn.
PSA: I'm currΣntlψ in sΣarch Φf a phψsicallψ hΣalthψ and mΣntallψ stablΣ burgundψblΦΦd tΣst subjΣct willing tΦ prΦvidΣ samplΣs tΦ furthΣr mψ rΣsΣarch. PsiΦnics prΣfΣrrΣd, but nΦt rΣquirΣd. As statΣd prΣviΦuslψ, cΦmpΣnsatiΦn will bΣ prΦvidΣd tΦ vΦluntΣΣrs. If ψΦu'rΣ intΣrΣstΣd in dΦnating samplΣs, ΣvΣn if ψΦu dΦn't mΣΣt this critΣria, ψΦu'rΣ wΣlcΦmΣ tΦ DM mΣ with inquiriΣs. I'm wΦrking dΦwn a list, but will cΦntact vΦluntΣΣrs whΣn nΣΣdΣd.

