♣ mediated by @taxonomicAnalysis
GANDER’S GANDER INTO THE FOLKS OF CHITTR PART ⒋⒊ — @ambivalentGangsta Lorn Ryder Lorn Ryder. … Bottom Text. That’s it! That’s the Intro! You’re welcome, Folks. Crimedoers. Crimenotdoers. Destroyers. People, horned and not horned. Hummus and Trolns. (What) Anywhomst’nt’ve, Let’s Take A Gander at Lorn Ryder! (CROWD CHEER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!) (That’s a lot of Exclamation Marks) (A Hundred Caegars to whoever counts them All!) Lorn is a people person. An OUTWARD AND HUMOROUS PERSON at that. They hold a lax, friendly and collected attitude, often unshaken by the whims of others. She is infinitely patient with everybody, a vital emotional regulator and a soft skill as… *gulp*, a ⒎/⒈⒈ worker. (My condolences for having a job. I’m a Chud-in-Training.) She has a hardworking attitude and knows how to work with people in general. After all, Lorn has experienced worse than being yelled at by some grumpy old coot. (This isn’t necessarily EXPRESSED in her platform, but—you just know, You Know? You played The Game. That Changes People!) Her posts are a constant response to the algorithm and friends alike, extending his questions and ventures for a GREATER AUDIENCE. A Classic Refrain——don’t forget to take your meds; does anyone (⒈) want something from the Store? This GENRE OF PEOPLE is what I like to call the Comfort Conduits: people who absorb and reflect the care they are given. And, in a different sort of light, Lorn is capable of responding FLIPPANTLY, perhaps POINTEDLY (see: Literally Every Interaction With Lord English). Caring about people comes as easily as breathing to him, a constant in those BOUND BY SPACE, but this shows to be a curiosity in her case. More on this shortly. So as we all know, kindness is the easiest way to engage and connect with people on a social platform. The need for social approval in a space where it’s hard to be recognized for who they are. Lorn is naturally attuned to the feelings of others, but this sort of continual altruism can be costly to the actor. What does it mean to proffer a helping hand without expecting a reward? This is where I hope I don’t perturb you, reader: ALTRUISM IS, IN TRUTH, A SOCIAL CONTRONYM. Every altruistic act is in a way a selfish act, given that the social actor—Lorn, in this case—works in their own interests, experiencing her world in the way that he wants to. Like all of us, we desire control over our situation, and even without the intention to, we subsequently shape the people around us. This fosters a feedback loop: consolidating our image, ushering interactions from people, and shifting how you pose in the metaphorical mirror. It’s a constant response to our algorithm. The algorithm rewards toxicity in the same way it rewards positivity, and Lorn takes advantage of this, though this isn’t done entirely consciously. THIS IS THE FURTHEST THING FROM UNHEALTHINESS, for the record! And I don’t MEAN TO DEMEAN ALTRUISM, but these are necessary angles to understand selflessness and how to make the most of it. But what about Lorn, the person? Moreover, the person disambiguated from their acts of service? The branching attitude from self to others is CENTRAL TO HIS IDENTITY—this is the best way to feel like a person, or at least the easiest way——but what about her alone? Maybe there is an okayness in being Just Lorn, a disinterest in being a person that isn’t tenderly watching over the people they care about. Situating oneself in the interests of other people—-his closest approximation of what they want/need—-is not only out of fascination but an ease in understanding them over herself. After all, it isn’t easy to describe yourself when you’ve nestled yourself in a CONCEPTUAL LIMBO. Unflappability coincides with working a job, a slow avenue to death, but also a way of keeping his mind off things as a whole. Arguably this aligns with their painstaking attitude to work, picking ↑ the pace and slack where others are falling behind. It’s tiring, but it’s OK in the end. Because if it isn’t, that’s when things FALL APART. This is where I believe their aspect comes into play to reveal the format of her SELF-SCHEMA. The plight of the Bard is that they shadow their opposite aspect, which obfuscates the self more than anything else. Destroyer classes struggle with this sort of SELF-CONCEPTUALIZATION. What I find most peculiar is how Lorn manages to balance both TIME and SPACE as elements to her identity, rather than one (⒈) being a shell to the other. (I guess this is where the ambivalence comes from, LOL!) Lorn has permitted the destruction of space, but this appears to usher in a fount of OPPORTUNITY than RAVAGE. As a person and as a concept, Lorn doesn’t wear Time like a carapace to break out of but a second skin. The repeating theme of Just Doing His Part reflects their spatial awareness, having everything in its → place while also working actively to keep things that way. What does this mean to you? BEHOLD! The part where I 🗨 about YOU, to YOU (I hope): so, you care A LOT, LOT *LOT* about people. We’re all defined by these meaningful interactions. It envelops a major part of your SELFHOOD, but there are times where you use it to obscure than embrace. I hope you’re not taking a crowdmember seat in the Peanut Gallery of your own life. There’s a reason why you have destroyed, and that (I believe) boils ↓ to the way you were brought. (It’s not in my place to say much on this aspect, but I know someone (⒈) who has been indoctrinated at youth when I see one.) Don’t fear the destruction you have brought/will bring. Not like I think you don’t! It’s meant to be a good thing, a weapon of change, a Space you must first Break to then Discover. You know, kind of like a Geode, LOL. In the end, ensure you find yourself in the spaces you build to shelter people. And for Pete’s Sake, PLEASE take your own advice! (I don’t even know a Pete——naming other people shows how Earnest I’m being!) SEE ALSO: SOLOMON’S PARADOX, SOCIAL CONDITIONING/SOCIAL ROLE THEORY, THE ‘REWARD’ OF ALTRUISM, ALTRUISM AS A WHOLE, EMPATHY, PROSOCIAL MOTIVATION. (CLASSPECT: BARD OF SPACE! Beckons destruction of space. Patience incarnate. Lorn is doing their best to keep this palatable to your digital tastebuds. ♥ yourself the way you ♥ others. I’ve said enough.) Lorn Ryder. The Person. The Myth. The Legend. FOLLOW HIM!!! I’ll see you in the NEXT ONE (⒈)! #gandertag #food #thepolicyofinteraction #chicken #thebard #born #altruistictendencies
Listen, I don't care HOW excited you are for another sequel to In Which A Particularly Entitled In—Gro↑ Of Violet Trolls Loses Their Benefactor And Inheritance, And It Goes Without Saying That One (1) Of Them Is The Killer, But This Is Subverted Very Early On By A Reveal That It Was Actually The True Main Character Of The Film, A Lowblood Servant, On Accident, Who Is Also The Only Good Person Involved With This Collective, Which The Deceased Benefactor Recognized, Which Is Why He ← Her All His Money From Being An Author, And As She Is Coping With This Transition And Being Threatened By The Particularly Entitled In—Gro↑ (Now Out—Gro↑, To Our Main Character) She Is Approached By The Black Woolbeast Of The Gro↑ In Question, Who Is Secretly The Real Killer In Another Thrilling Subersion, And Then All His Plots Are Unveiled By The Brilliant Detective (Who Seems Unusually Simple At First Due To His Relaxed Southern Northern Alternian Demeanor And Tendency To Ramble) And Then The Real Main Character Finally Inherits Everything After All, Without Having To Jeopardize Her Moral Character Or Immigration Status.
I'm currently battling this Deadly Disease called Procrastinating.
READING ONTO THE RECORD! shit, that's actually pretty cool.