The Rankmaid @archiveAddict had a fantastic idea in explaining the ways we utilize the Chittr reacti9ns, as they are quite am6igu9us and leave t99 much r99m f9r interpretati9n. I am 9f c9urse still rallying f9r a less quadrant-f9cused and m9re c9ncise reacti9n system, 6ut until then, my intended use case is 6el9w. Please d9n't read any r9mantic s9licitati9ns in the things I react. ♥ - I liked y9ur p9st, agreed with what y9u had t9 say, 9r disagreed 6ut f9und it well-written and th9ughtful regardless. ♦ - I find y9ur p9st pitia6le in a strictly plat9nic sense, meaning s9mething y9u've written has elicited feelings 9f sympathy fr9m me. ♠ - I disliked y9ur p9st. This can mean anything fr9m disagreeing with y9ur w9rds themselves, y9ur t9ne, 9r the language y9u've used t9 get y9ur p9int acr9ss. ♣ - I find that y9u are 6eing intenti9nally inflammat9ry and y9u need t9 step away fr9m y9ur device, take a deep 6reath, t9uch s9me grass, and c9me 6ack t9 me when y9u're ready t9 have a dicussi9n like an adult. ♥♦♠♣ - I d9n't kn9w that I've ever used all f9ur reacti9ns 9n a single p9st. If s9, perhaps I've f9und it c9nfusing, and I'll pr96a6ly ask y9u t9 clarify whatever p9int y9u think y9u're making. And s9me c9m6inati9ns 9f my 9wn: ♥♦ - I still liked y9ur p9st 9r agreed with it, 6ut s9mething y9u've said made me feel 6ad f9r y9u, such as #Traumadumping. ♦♠ - I disliked y9ur p9st 9r disagreed with it, 6ut s9mething y9u've said made me feel 6ad f9r y9u, such as pu6lically lamenting #Relati9nshipW9es. ♠♣ - I think y9u are making a #F99l 9f y9urself and y9u're em6arrassing all 9f us. ♥♠ - Mixed feelings. ♦♣ - Mixed feelings with the added caveat that perhaps it w9uld 6e unwise t9 c9ntinue engaging with the em9ti9nal state y9u're in. ♦♠♣ - I've g9ne 9ut 9f my way f9r s9me reas9n t9 specifically n9t like y9ur p9st 6ecause y9ur p9st d9esn't merit a p9sitive reacti9n, f9r whatever reas9n. Again, I d9u6t I've ever used this c9m6inati9n 9f reacti9ns, 6ut I supp9se I c9uld imagine a use f9r it. If any9ne has any 9ther questi9ns, feel free t9 ask me. I w9uld 6e m9re than happy t9 pr9vide s9me clarificati9n 9n these matters. #Trends #TrendF9ll9wing #Reacti9nplay
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 this is the correct take tbh the randomness and lawlessness of the reaction system is a feature. i am absolutely not enshrining anything abt its use in the rules lmfao -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- fotmAYpaIdEFJMdxjYg+mlfITvk+JDbZeMecNjHxmZvmHVYVNYJRXMXwI+SVtHNd IKpvupTicMRzmZ+pjxBXVTaPOAylgySvKEdBRrySulx+PJj+ErBSTYSZnMxhhjLy sEkYVdzxJXHM+XpfLwRuqxbfmrEDwOVgkUNgUkkZVYquSfaA/hdsqDjupRXWpppF fnlf/lSXMaX+YKXXNbLHIJh+nVyUapdgEVWFhylHr/c+wggEETNDmEzxwffIidYR TiHb+FbJAmUKUcsrHwhAaB+Ew+kmTVoJYDHPgCZtrBsxOchfZgjfU/CqyKcOrxKt lXQbqLNAWatYSmYfXscrOEzGOBlIXRXIsGufih/yAaZRpexkSgrhxvT/CSH+N+nT yHQd =fTMW -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
normally a post llike this woulld make me want to kick your ass but this one time, and NO ONE get used to me saying this, Eridan is Right
And that my friiend2 ii2 why you 2houldn't be fuckiing wiith 2y2tem2 you have no iidea on what the backend look2 liike. II wa2 really hopiing not two have two 2pell iit out two you all, II fiigured iit wa2 2elf eviident, but no, apparently not.
TOO LONG. I MADE THIS SAME POST THREE DAYS AGO. AND SHORTER. PLEASE CONSULT THE ANCIENT TEXTS: HTTPS://CHITTR.ING/PROFILE/HANDMAID/398F0194-D186-4CEF-B686-BCA79F4E1FAA
I appreciate y9ur resp9nse, 6ut as y9u can see if y9u f9ll9w the reply chain a little m9re cl9sely, n9ne 9f my c9mments in this thread 6ef9re this 9ne have 6een addressed t9 y9u. Please direct y9ur ire elsewhere. Thank y9u.
If y9u reread my initial Chitt a little m9re cl9sely, y9u'll see that it was in resp9nse t9 a hashtag trend started 6y the Rankmaid and has n9thing t9 d9 with y9urs. N9t t9 menti9n, 9ur f9rmats are c9mpletely different. Y9u didn't even explain what individual reacti9ns mean t9 y9u, y9u just jumped straight int9 c9m6inati9ns. I hardly see the relevance.
ALL OF THE REACTION OPTIONS ON THIS WEBSITE ARE SELF-EXPLANATORY. ALL OF THEIR CONJUNCTIVE USES ARE *ALSO* PRETTY GODDAMN SELF-EXPLANATORY. I SEE NO REASON WHY YOU WOULD NEED TO PROVIDE THE ENTIRE TROLLSETTA FUCKING STONE FOR THESE NUMBNUGS TO DECIPHER SHIT THAT SHOULD HONESTLY BE COMPLETELY INTUITIVE. AREN'T YOU SUPPOSED TO HAVE BETTER THINGS TO DO AT YOUR AGE? I MEAN, COME ON.
Y9u may find the reacti9ns self-explanat9ry, and I applaud y9u f9r that, really, I d9, 6ut y9u d9n't speak f9r every9ne. Chittr has a significant min9rity 9f n9n-tr9ll users wh9 frequently express c9nfusi9n a69ut what it means t9, f9r example, mediate a Chitt. I rec9mmend paying cl9ser attenti9n t9 y9ur feed if y9u truly 6elieve 9therwise. And my age? Really? What w9uld y9u kn9w a69ut my age 9r the s9-called "6etter" things am I supp9sed t9 6e d9ing at such an age, stranger wh9se identity is c9mpletely unfamiliar t9 me? The last time I checked, y9u have n9 auth9rity 9ver me t9 tell me what I sh9uld 9r sh9uldn't 6e d9ing with my 9wn free will.
EACH OF THE OPTIONS HAS A NAME. THE BUTTONS LITERALLY TELL YOU WHAT YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO USE THEM FOR. IF I WERE TO PUT THIS CHARITABLY, I WOULD SAY YOU'RE DENYING THEM ANY CHANCE TO DEDUCE ANY SHRED OF SOCIAL NUANCE ON THEIR OWN GODDAMN TERMS BY SPELLING IT OUT FOR THEM WITH THE OLD WOODEN WRIGGLER BLOCKS. BUT I'M ACTUALLY TRYING TO BE NICE HERE, SO LET ME JUST LEAVE IT AT THAT. AND GOD. I WOULD BE A LITERAL FUCKING FOOL IF I ASSUMED I HAD ANY JURISDICTION AT ALL OVER WHAT *YOU* DID OR DIDN'T DO. BUT FOR THE LOVE OF HIS HONORABLE TUTELAGE'S FETID FUCKING SHAME JUNCTURE, DON'T PRETEND LIKE YOU DON'T KNOW WHO I AM! AND I SAY THIS WITH A HEALTHY AMOUNT OF SYMPATHY. GENUINELY. THE ALOOF ACT DOES *NOT* WORK FOR YOU. STOP TRYING TO WORKSHOP IT.
If this is y9ur idea 9f 6eing nice, y9u have a l9t t9 learn a69ut the use 9f t9ne. Perhaps y9u sh9uld try 9ut #T9neIndicat9rs s9 y9u can m9re effectively get y9ur p9int acr9ss. F9r example, y9u are 6eing very patr9nizing t9wards me right n9w and I ask that y9u st9p. /n9tmad Perhaps y9u sh9uld reread my initial chitt and 96serve that it was in keeping with a hashtag trend specifically 6ecause s9me pe9ple are incapa6le 9f advanced thinking and require further educati9n 9n matters that n9t every9ne finds "simple". /n9tupset /6eingnice /friendlysuggesti9n And n9, I d9n't kn9w wh9 y9u are, and I ask y9u that y9u st9p talking t9 me with any level 9f familiarity. As far as I'm c9ncerned, any passing similarities y9u 6ear t9 my ancest9r are purely c9incidental, as any true ancest9r 9f mine w9uldn't 6e s9 ashamed 9f his true identity and try t9 hide it in fav9r 9f 6ec9ming an9ther 96edient c9g in the hem99ppressive machine. If there's any9ne wh9 sh9uld 6e sympathetic 9f the 9ther here, it sh9uld 6e me t9 y9u, n9t the 9ther way ar9und.