Kankri Vantas
@prosaicPedagogy
I am m9stly here t9 96serve | She/her | Transfem
Haaaappy #matespritm9nday t9 my matesprit @equiusZahhak! AND t9 my girlfriend Aitar, wh9 d9es n9t have a chittr! I d9 appreciate them 69th; here are pictures 9f me with 69th. H9wever, my girlfriend is my girlfriend, and I d9n't use a quad with her, 6ut I d9 want t9 appreciate her as well.
D --> You are so pretty love
Every time I attempt t9 gr9w my hair 9ut, I end up ch9pping it all 9ff. I think sh9rt hair is 6est.
D --> You are very pretty with short hair
Hell9, Equius.
D --> Hello my beautiful and darling girl
Tags: #l9ngp9st #6eautystandards #m9rality #m9ralt9pics #c9nventi9nal6eauty6eingusedasm9ralindicat9r #readitify9uwantt9 I am jumping 9ff this p9st 6ecause I have 9pini9ns 9n 6eauty standards 6eing used as a marker 9f m9rality. C9ntext: https://chittr.ing/pr9file/aeneasCaldarium/00adaa85-a20c-4048-6e46-0c0067186679 Y9ur pers9nality and acti9ns can 6e ugly, 6ut pe9ple sh9uld n9t apply that t9 the way s9me9ne physically l99ks. It's 6ad t9 assume that s9me9ne with a 6ad pers9nality will have "ugly" features. It sets a precedent and 6elief that every9ne wh9 is "ugly" is 6ad. S9 when that pers9n is attractive 6y s9cietal standards. Pe9ple are willing t9 f9rgive them f9r their acti9ns. This s9rt 9f thing is seen time and time again. "Y9u have a 6ad pers9nality, s9 y9u must 6e ugly," and s9 when pe9ple see them, they switch up t9 "9h w9w, y9u're attractive, s9 what y9u're saying can't 6e that 6ad!" This als9 sets up a space f9r features that aren't c9mm9n and/9r aren't c9nsidered part 9f the c9nventi9nal 6eauty standard t9 6e c9nsidered ugly, and plenty 9f attractive pe9ple are shuffled t9 this area 9f where pe9ple 6elieve they are m9rally 6ad 6ecause they're "ugly." H9lding pe9ple's m9rals t9 what they l99k like and the "y9ur pers9nality makes u ugly" is inherently harmful; just dislike s9me9ne f9r 6eing a 6ad pers9n with shitty m9rals. St9p using 6eauty as a m9ral indicat9r.
Is this a long, round-a8out, and convoluted way of saying you're ugly without saying you're ugly? Get a GRIP!!!!!!!!
Aw, wittle Kan-Kan mad a8out getting their pretentious ass called out? Tch!!!!!!!!
// I'm gonna stop the conversation here; I do not appreciate people calling her ugly. Please go elsewhere.
(Oh aight my b chief.)
it says a lot about society that people assume im ugly just because im a bad person
I agree 6ut I'll make a separate p9st a69ut it.
{r} https://cdn.imgchest.com/files/8945a5140098.png {r} ((Ty @caligulaAscendit !!!))
9h, y9u aren't unattractive. Y9u have nicely styled hair.
Carpus R9man9... Hmmmm
hello gorgeous!
eyyyy!
Are y9u enj9ying chittr s9 far? N9t t9 anything that w9uld p9ssi6ly put y9u in danger9us situati9ns?
so many hot and sexy babes! no danger here for carpus romano!
N9thing else 9f value f9r y9u? 6ut there are a l9t 9f attractive individuals here. S9 I will n9t disagree. 9h, h9w relieving- s9mething was p9sted s9metime 6ef9re y9u j9ined; quite a 6ad p9st.
Gaslighting 9nly w9rks if y9u're n9t talking t9 Equius. @equiusZahhak
D --> That is a good thing right love
Anyway Cra6 up9n ye 🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀
Time to make some crab stew. :)
I'm n9t p9sting a wall 9f text, 6ut 6ecause I saw it and I was sn99ping 9n Cr9nus's (@/aeneasCaldarium) p9sts t9 get c9ntext f9r s9mething. I saw ee's (@/emptyEyes) p9st, and I agree with her. Generally, it is pretty wild that Cr9nus, wh9 has p9sted and tagged all his p9sts, gets m9re shit than a few jade harleys wh9 just p9st a69ut their UNTAGGED n9n-c9nsensual escapades. It's n9t a "Well, a w9man did it, and theref9re it's 6etter." It's a y9u all have a prec9nceived assumpti9n 9f Cr9nus Amp9ra and that y9u use that 6asis t9 act a certain way t9wards him (and his alts) When, 6y far, he's just 6eing ann9ying and h9rny. THIS IS N9T AN INVITATI9N T9 FLIRT 6Y THE WAY. I am just saying the hyp9crisy is pretty crazy. This isn't t9 say his acti9ns 9r the Jades are excusa6le; 6y n9 means d9 I agree with him 9r her. 6ut the we6site has rules; s9metimes they're n9t f9ll9wed, and f9r all the skeeve he has in the w9rld, he's tagging it at least. The 6are minimum, 6ut it's tagged. #nsfw #n9nc9n #du6c9n #nsfwe #hyp9crisy #suggestivec9ntent #nsfwc9ntent #directp9sting #vaguep9sting
If y9u are a jade wh9 has made untagged NSFW c9ntent that inv9lves #rape/#n9nc9n/#du6c9n, then I am talking a69ut y9u and the 9ther jades wh9 d9 it. This is n9t directed at just 9ne jade. If y9u are participating in sexual acts that are menti9ned in this p9st and d9 n9t tag y9ur c9ntent, this is a69ut y9u. If y9u are n9t, this is n9t a69ut y9u. Are y9u d9ing these things in this p9st and n9t tagging it? 6ecause then it is a69ut y9u t99.
not... recently? in fact i think i always tagged it even when i was evil, is is literally your only issue with this stuff whether it is tagged or not?
Then this is n9t a69ut y9u. If y9u reread the p9st, my issue is that pe9ple are 6eing hyp9critical at Cr9nus f9r p9sting #du6c9n and tagging it when there are jades wh9 p9st a69ut #n9nc9n/#du6c9n and d9 n9t tag it. I was pretty clear a69ut what my p9st was a69ut. It is als9 in the we6site's rules t9 tag that c9ntent. S9 yes, I d9 have issues with that as well.
but you... dont have a problem with the actual abuse hes doing?
9h my stars and garters. It is tagged, it is n9t against the site rules t9 p9st it. He tags it, th9se tags can 6e 6l9cked. THE JADES ARE N9T TAGGING THEIR SEXUAL ASSAULT/RAPE AND A6USE 9F 9THER W9MEN. THAT IS MY ISSUE. ARE Y9U DULL? #nsfwe #du6c9n #n9nc9n What are y9u misunderstanding? There's l9ads 9f a6use c9ntent 9n this we6site tagged.
(( to be clear, this is kankri ic caring more about tagging than (ic) irl abuse, right? just wanna make sure in case this gets out of hand ))
(( Kankri's post outlines exactly what she is talking about, because the post had nothing to do with abuse content or IRL abuse. It's about untagged nsfwe content that she outlined in her post; she is not talking about IRL abuse because she is not a real person.
(( no i know, but irl *to her* i mean. like, diegetic ))
// I feel as if you are trying to take her post and replies in bad faith. She did not agree with or approve of the content Cronus was posting because the post was about people being angry about Cronus's posts (which he has tagged and can be blacklisted), but it is totally fine when Jade makes the same stuff untagged and cannot be picked up by a blacklist. This had nothing to do with Kankri's personal opinions about abuse and sexism because it's about NSFWE content within the guidelines of the website. What Jade brought up is completely unrelated to what Kankri is talking about in this post. If she wanted to talk about sexism and abuse, she would have. This post is about the hypocrisy of 2 people based on their already known identities.
// Actually, 6ecause 9f the IC/99C 6lur I am g9ing t9 6l9ck y9u. have a nice day.
I made a typ9 in reply t9 my 9wn chitt. Ah. AAAAAAH.
n0 recovering fr0m the aura loss there with0ut straight up staff intervention.
d0n't hype it up so much. h0w's aitar?
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA9UGH, She's d9ing alright fr9m the last time we talked; I need t9 spend s9me time with her; 9therwise, she is g99d. H9w are y9u?
atr0cious but what else is new.
9h, that's a shame. Well, if y9u have free time at all in the future, y9u sh9uld c9me here and have tea with me.