Troll Albert Einstein
@specialRelativity
Alternian-born theoretical physicist
Suntzu has introduce⁻d me⁻ to this "Triple⁻ T" fe⁻llow. I do quite⁻ like⁻ his de⁻me⁻anour.
Which do you be⁻lie⁻ve⁻ e⁻xe⁻rts gre⁻ate⁻r we⁻ight in our atmosphe⁻re⁻? A kilogram of ste⁻e⁻l, or a kilogram of cluckbe⁻ast fe⁻athe⁻rs?
the steel? because steel is heavier than feathers
[|87 :: 1 k;logram ;s 1 k;logram. Gotta love th;s one. An old;e but a g00d;e
steel is just steel though. with the feathers you also have the guilt weighing down on you too knowing what you did to those animals
i would feel no guilt.
Should I post some⁻ daily proble⁻ms for pe⁻ople⁻ to solve⁻? I think that could be⁻ fun.
⫸ id l⨀ve th4t!!!!
I think what we⁻ should re⁻ally be⁻ #ye⁻arning for is knowle⁻dge⁻, and e⁻ngaging in the⁻ pursuit of it. Who is with me⁻ on this? #foodforthought #le⁻arning
* mmm fooood
Iron-56 is ofte⁻n cite⁻d to be⁻ the⁻ most stable⁻ nucle⁻us, as it has the⁻ lowe⁻st mass-pe⁻r-nucle⁻on of any e⁻le⁻me⁻nt, and is the⁻ e⁻nd product of a lot of radioactive⁻ re⁻actions such as intraste⁻llar fusion. Howe⁻ve⁻r, de⁻spite⁻ be⁻ing far, far rare⁻r in its formation, nicke⁻l-62 is actually more⁻ stable⁻ by de⁻finition, having the⁻ highe⁻st binding e⁻ne⁻rgy pe⁻r nucle⁻on that we⁻ know of. This me⁻ans it would take⁻ more⁻ e⁻ne⁻rgy pe⁻r nucle⁻on to se⁻parate⁻ a nicke⁻l-62 nucle⁻us than an iron-56 one⁻. #funfacts #scie⁻nce⁻
If you discove⁻re⁻d a ne⁻w subatomic particle⁻ this month, what would you name⁻ it? #QOTD
Bob, I think
Bullshitium.
Thanks, Troll Albert Einstein! :D
The⁻ Higgs boson was almost nickname⁻d the⁻ "Goddamn Particle⁻", so this is more⁻ be⁻lie⁻vable⁻ than you think.
hehehehe fart ^_^
If you synchronise⁻ two clocks, le⁻aving one⁻ on the⁻ ground and taking anothe⁻r into an airship trave⁻lling we⁻stward around Alte⁻rnia for a while⁻, the⁻ clock in the⁻ airship will tick at a rate⁻ slowe⁻r than the⁻ clock on the⁻ ground. Re⁻turning the⁻ airship clock to the⁻ ground, it will re⁻turn to the⁻ same⁻ rate⁻ of ticking as the⁻ grounde⁻d clock - but will be⁻ e⁻ve⁻r so slightly be⁻hind.
.EID TONNAC UOY EMIT EROM ON SI EREHT ECNIs .ESREVINU EHT FO DNE EHT EES DNA DEEPS YTINIFNI OG TSUj
The⁻ e⁻nd of the⁻ unive⁻rse⁻ doe⁻s not ne⁻ce⁻ssitate⁻ the⁻ e⁻nd of time⁻. In our curre⁻nt unde⁻rstanding it is me⁻re⁻ly an e⁻ve⁻nt at some⁻ point in the⁻ future⁻.
The⁻ e⁻nd of the⁻ unive⁻rse⁻ doe⁻s not e⁻quate⁻ to the⁻ disappe⁻arance⁻ of the⁻ unive⁻rse⁻. We⁻ be⁻lie⁻ve⁻ it would still e⁻xist pe⁻r se⁻, but me⁻re⁻ly as a colle⁻ctive⁻ of cold, ine⁻rt mole⁻cule⁻s as far as the⁻ he⁻at de⁻ath the⁻ory sugge⁻sts.
!DNE STIW YM OT EB THGUORB SAH NOITASREVNOC SIHt .ESREVINU EHT FO DNE EHT TON STI NEHT ,DNUORA LLITS SI ESREVINU EHT Fi
Say, if the⁻ e⁻ntire⁻ mass of the⁻ unive⁻rse⁻ we⁻re⁻ to transform into e⁻ne⁻rgy, and the⁻n radiate⁻ outwards into the⁻ nothingne⁻ss of space⁻, would you conside⁻r that the⁻ e⁻nd of the⁻ unive⁻rse⁻, as the⁻re⁻ is nothing tangible⁻ le⁻ft of it?
Its passage⁻ is affe⁻cte⁻d by mass, but we⁻ do not be⁻lie⁻ve⁻ time⁻ has mass itse⁻lf.
!EMAS EHT LLA FFO EM SSIP DNA NOITASREVNOC SIHT FO EM DNIMER DLUOW HSA RUOY ESUAC REHTOB NEVE i DLUOW YHW Os .HSA RUOY LLITS SI EREHT ESUACEB ENOG TON ERA UOY HSA OTNI YDOB RUOY NRUT i Fi .TFEL ESREVINU EMOS LLITS SI EREHT ROF EREHT DNA ESREVINU EHT FO TRAP SI EMIt .ON NEHt
I would like⁻ to find the⁻ artist re⁻sponsible⁻ for this caricature⁻ of me⁻ and Troll Nikola Te⁻sla. It is wonde⁻rfully charming to look at. https://file⁻.garde⁻n/X5nOw-a95myVyjmt/te⁻e⁻nage⁻_mutant_ninja_turtle⁻s.png
If you think about it, Jason Voorhe⁻e⁻s is a forsake⁻n slashe⁻r.
Imaginary numbe⁻rs are⁻ fun. The⁻y ge⁻t the⁻ir name⁻ from having be⁻e⁻n doubte⁻d by the⁻ mathe⁻matical community be⁻fore⁻ the⁻y we⁻re⁻ acce⁻pte⁻d.
How do you change⁻ your profile⁻ picture⁻? Mine⁻ appe⁻ars to have⁻ be⁻e⁻n de⁻le⁻te⁻d or re⁻place⁻d or some⁻thing.
################################################################################ ################################################################################ ##################################++++++++++++################################## ###########################+- --+########################## #######################+- -+###################### ####################-. -+################### #################+- -################# ###############+ .############### #############+ .############# ############. +########### ########### ++##++- +++- .########## #########+ +#########+ +########- ######### ########. +###########+ .############ +####### #######+ #############. #############- ####### ######+ ############+. #############- .###### ######- -###########. .+########### ###### ###### -+#####++ +########- ##### ###### +#### #####. -#### ##### -#### ##### -#### ##### -#### #####+ +#### ###### +##- +- ##### ######- .##### -####- +##### ######+ +#####+ .#####+ .###### #######+ .+####+ +#####- +###### ########. .+#####. .+#####+ +####### #########+ -######+. +######+ -######## ##########- .########+. #########+ +######### ###########+ -+##############################+ .########### #############+ .-+######################-. .############# ###############+ .----+++++----. -############## #################+ .+################ ###################+- -################### ######################+- -###################### ##########################+-. .-+######################### ################################+++++- -++++################################ ################################################################################ ################################################################################
Oh, I am ve⁻rifie⁻d! Ve⁻ry nice⁻. I was not aware⁻.
I wonde⁻r if we⁻ will be⁻ able⁻ to form a Bose⁻-Einste⁻in conde⁻nsate⁻ in the⁻ ne⁻xt 50 swe⁻e⁻ps.
I wish it we⁻re⁻ e⁻asie⁻r for re⁻liable⁻ scie⁻ntific findings to be⁻ made⁻ more⁻ re⁻adily available⁻. Much of what is share⁻d - in te⁻rms of what is actually true⁻ - is only be⁻cause⁻ it appe⁻als to the⁻ common troll, e⁻ithe⁻r out of intrigue⁻, or to te⁻ll a story. It is a gre⁻at shame⁻ that it's impossible⁻ to pre⁻ve⁻nt distortion by the⁻ pre⁻ss.
Unfortunate⁻ly not able⁻ to make⁻ NYCStuck. I am in a confe⁻re⁻nce⁻. Pe⁻rhaps ne⁻xt ye⁻ar? If Miss. Roixmr pe⁻rmits vide⁻o came⁻ras, some⁻one⁻ ple⁻ase⁻ re⁻cord he⁻r conce⁻rt for me⁻, thank you.
If you add the⁻ digits of any multiple⁻ of 9, and re⁻pe⁻at this until you ge⁻t a single⁻-digit answe⁻r, the⁻y'll always add to 9. Isn't that ne⁻at?
Spe⁻cial re⁻lativity is base⁻d on two postulate⁻s which are⁻ contradictory in classical me⁻chanics: that 1) the⁻ laws of physics are⁻ the⁻ same⁻ for all obse⁻rve⁻rs in any ine⁻rtial frame⁻ of re⁻fe⁻re⁻nce⁻ re⁻lative⁻ to one⁻ anothe⁻r, and that 2) the⁻ spe⁻e⁻d of light in vacuo is the⁻ same⁻ for all obse⁻rve⁻rs, re⁻gardle⁻ss of the⁻ir re⁻lative⁻ motion or of the⁻ motion of the⁻ light source⁻.
Having someone blocked on account A means you can't reply to them under any other account. @dynamicFlowfields Is this intentional site behaviour?
(( yeah, it seems you got ooc blocked. There are two types of blocks, ic and ooc ))
Actually, no. I unblocked a target on account A, and the rest of my accounts were free to reply to the target. They'd never blocked me.
The⁻ troll Dopple⁻r e⁻ffe⁻ct might have⁻ be⁻e⁻n misconstrue⁻d. Pe⁻rhaps the⁻ space⁻ be⁻twe⁻e⁻n us and the⁻se⁻ distant stars is incre⁻asing not be⁻cause⁻ the⁻y have⁻ ve⁻locity, but be⁻cause⁻ the⁻ physical space⁻ be⁻twe⁻e⁻n us and the⁻m is e⁻xpanding?
thanks for sharing einstein