Troll Albert Einstein
@specialRelativity
Alternian-born theoretical physicist
They're c★lling her, perh★ps the most st★ble girl ever.
Scie⁻ntorme⁻ntors looking at the⁻ nicke⁻l-62 nucle⁻us:
If you discove⁻re⁻d a ne⁻w subatomic particle⁻ this month, what would you name⁻ it? #QOTD
Bob, I think
Bullshitium.
The⁻ Higgs boson was almost nickname⁻d the⁻ "Goddamn Particle⁻", so this is more⁻ be⁻lie⁻vable⁻ than you think.
@speci★lRel★tivity do you offer tutoring services?
Inde⁻e⁻d! I am available⁻ to do my be⁻st in te⁻aching on whate⁻ve⁻r topic you would like⁻ to le⁻arn.
C★n you give me ★ b★sic rundown of like qu★ntum mech★nics?
Ele⁻ctromagne⁻tic radiation, like⁻ light, trave⁻ls both as a wave⁻ and a particle⁻. The⁻ e⁻ne⁻rgy of the⁻ particle⁻ (which is calle⁻d the⁻ photon) is dire⁻ctly proportional to the⁻ fre⁻que⁻ncy of the⁻ wave⁻. This is a ve⁻ry small amount of e⁻ne⁻rgy pe⁻r photon, though, as individual photons are⁻ so small the⁻y e⁻ffe⁻ctive⁻ly have⁻ 'ze⁻ro' mass. If you be⁻am photons onto a me⁻tal surface⁻ with a) e⁻nough e⁻ne⁻rgy and b) e⁻nough fre⁻que⁻ncy, it will re⁻move⁻ e⁻le⁻ctrons from the⁻ me⁻tal surface⁻, be⁻cause⁻ e⁻ach photon carrie⁻s a ce⁻rtain amount of e⁻ne⁻rgy to transfe⁻r to the⁻ e⁻le⁻ctrons, and so be⁻low a ce⁻rtain fre⁻que⁻ncy (thus, be⁻low a ce⁻rtain e⁻ne⁻rgy thre⁻shold), this e⁻ffe⁻ct doe⁻s not occur, proving that light wave⁻s must also act as particle⁻s. This same⁻ wave⁻-particle⁻ duality e⁻xists within all matte⁻r, but wave⁻le⁻ngth de⁻cre⁻ase⁻s as mass or ve⁻locity incre⁻ase⁻, so it is ofte⁻n ve⁻ry hard to se⁻e⁻ this in e⁻ffe⁻ct. High-spe⁻e⁻d e⁻le⁻ctrons may be⁻ re⁻dire⁻cte⁻d if trave⁻lling through a crystalline⁻ structure⁻ in which the⁻ space⁻ be⁻twe⁻e⁻n atoms is close⁻ to the⁻ e⁻le⁻ctrons' wave⁻le⁻ngths.
If you synchronise⁻ two clocks, le⁻aving one⁻ on the⁻ ground and taking anothe⁻r into an airship trave⁻lling we⁻stward around Alte⁻rnia for a while⁻, the⁻ clock in the⁻ airship will tick at a rate⁻ slowe⁻r than the⁻ clock on the⁻ ground. Re⁻turning the⁻ airship clock to the⁻ ground, it will re⁻turn to the⁻ same⁻ rate⁻ of ticking as the⁻ grounde⁻d clock - but will be⁻ e⁻ve⁻r so slightly be⁻hind.
You would only be⁻ immortal from e⁻ve⁻rybody e⁻lse⁻'s e⁻ye⁻s. Mayhe⁻ if you trave⁻l ne⁻ar the⁻ spe⁻e⁻d of light for long e⁻nough, you can live⁻ se⁻ve⁻ral ye⁻ars in a matte⁻r of days - but you will not fe⁻e⁻l as if you live⁻ any longe⁻r, the⁻ re⁻st of the⁻ unive⁻rse⁻ will just be⁻ faste⁻r to you.l until you slow down.
.EID TONNAC UOY EMIT EROM ON SI EREHT ECNIs .ESREVINU EHT FO DNE EHT EES DNA DEEPS YTINIFNI OG TSUj
The⁻ e⁻nd of the⁻ unive⁻rse⁻ doe⁻s not ne⁻ce⁻ssitate⁻ the⁻ e⁻nd of time⁻. In our curre⁻nt unde⁻rstanding it is me⁻re⁻ly an e⁻ve⁻nt at some⁻ point in the⁻ future⁻.
The⁻ e⁻nd of the⁻ unive⁻rse⁻ doe⁻s not e⁻quate⁻ to the⁻ disappe⁻arance⁻ of the⁻ unive⁻rse⁻. We⁻ be⁻lie⁻ve⁻ it would still e⁻xist pe⁻r se⁻, but me⁻re⁻ly as a colle⁻ctive⁻ of cold, ine⁻rt mole⁻cule⁻s as far as the⁻ he⁻at de⁻ath the⁻ory sugge⁻sts.
!DNE STIW YM OT EB THGUORB SAH NOITASREVNOC SIHt .ESREVINU EHT FO DNE EHT TON STI NEHT ,DNUORA LLITS SI ESREVINU EHT Fi
Say, if the⁻ e⁻ntire⁻ mass of the⁻ unive⁻rse⁻ we⁻re⁻ to transform into e⁻ne⁻rgy, and the⁻n radiate⁻ outwards into the⁻ nothingne⁻ss of space⁻, would you conside⁻r that the⁻ e⁻nd of the⁻ unive⁻rse⁻, as the⁻re⁻ is nothing tangible⁻ le⁻ft of it?
Its passage⁻ is affe⁻cte⁻d by mass, but we⁻ do not be⁻lie⁻ve⁻ time⁻ has mass itse⁻lf.
Weird. People I've never even seen before got me blocked.
Maybe⁻ the⁻y lost an argume⁻nt with you in the⁻ future⁻ and blocke⁻d you pre⁻-e⁻mptive⁻ly to save⁻ face⁻.
Oh. Now there's a Mr Einstein. You know what, maybe.
QṴESTIONS: POBICO CAN ANSWER ANY AND ALL BṴT DOESNT KNOW HOW TO GOREGLE FORM
The⁻ proce⁻ss of Gore⁻gling 'form' is simple⁻ if you would like⁻ me⁻ to walk you through it. https://file⁻.garde⁻n/X5nOw-a95myVyjmt/form.png
WHY AM I GETTING EG8ERT AM8USHED HELP???????? HELLO????????
THE REAL QUESTION YOU SHOULD BE ASKING: WHY AM I *NOT* DOING #COLLABS? [∙]
I'm going to roll 8 nat 20s and you're going to f8cking explode on the spot alright alright cool
FINE. BUT YOU SHOULD'VE TAKEN MY OFFER TO #COLLAB WHEN YOU HAD THE CHANCE. [⠌]
CHANGED MY MIND. I DON'T #COLLAB WITH WEAK LITTLE BUMS LIKE YOU. BYE BYE, LAME-O. [∙]
This re⁻minds me⁻ of an inte⁻re⁻sting tidbit I ponde⁻r ofte⁻n. While⁻ the⁻ we⁻ak force⁻ has the⁻ shorte⁻st range⁻ of the⁻ four fundame⁻ntal force⁻s, it is the⁻ only of the⁻m to affe⁻ct *all* particle⁻s with no limit.
I just got followed 8y what appears to 8e a variant of cali8orn calling itself a "conissour" of "spider 8itches" are you people on this site really th8t crazy a8out vriska fictives????????
Pe⁻rhaps this is due⁻ to some⁻ sort of force⁻ drawing in inte⁻ractions? I've⁻ be⁻e⁻n trying to figure⁻ out how the⁻ four fundame⁻ntal force⁻s link, and the⁻ one⁻ that's stumpe⁻d me⁻ most is gravity. You could posse⁻ss a particular we⁻ak, strong or e⁻le⁻ctromagne⁻tic inte⁻raction more⁻ probable⁻ than the⁻ me⁻dian particle⁻ inte⁻raction?
You'd think having a wide, heavy wall in front of something would shield it quite a bit. But my chest does nothing to stop people from reaching through to my heart. #suggestive
Pe⁻rhaps, rathe⁻r than focusing sole⁻ly on de⁻fe⁻nse⁻, you should make⁻ the⁻ first move⁻ of war?
and that labubu that breached containment was albert einstein #themoreyouknow #thelabubusituation
I can't say this is true⁻.
𝄠𝄵𝄆𝅘𝅥𝅮𝅘𝅥𝅮𝅘𝅥𝅮 @specialRelativity There's something I have been wondering about, that it may become possible to set up a nuclear chain reaction in a large mass of alumunum cladded Mountain Dew, by which vast amounts of power and large quantities of new fluorescent green-like sodas would be generated. What are your thoughts? 𝇓𝇓𝇓𝄀
𝄠𝄵𝄆𝅘𝅥𝅮𝅘𝅥𝅮𝅘𝅥𝅮 Let me know what the possibilities are while I work on some practical experiments with my colleagues. https://cdn.imgchest.com/files/f04f1132b34f.png #mountaindew #fissilematerial #soda #chainreaction 𝇓𝇓𝇓𝄀
Who tryna duel me... #combat #battle
A warrior who goe⁻s into battle⁻ without re⁻ason should have⁻ no e⁻xpe⁻ctation to win.