♥ liked by @torvousCarnifex
[T] Thank you for clarifying.] [A] As my boss does not have chittr account, I feel safe in making the very clear joke that I would deeply enjoy beating his head in with paperweight.] #violence
[E] Extremely happy to fulfill my duties.] [J] Just wish he would shut the fuck up.]
great job vvek thats wwhy wwe pay you a perfectly reasonable salary
Q: "do you knoww anything about your astrological chart?" A: not at all and i think astrology is embarrassingly stupid
Are they coming back???? I might actually pick one up if they do
[observed] chittr's page source. [reported] this was happening one way or another. // maybe against my will. [reported] you can do this too with a little technical know how. i pulled apart the document Chittr hands my browser when i request the main feed. this is not a penetration test. // correction: it is not presently a penetration test. i have not attempted to circumvent authentication, access anything my account was not given, or interfere with the service. this is just what the website hands me when i knock on it. first impression: pretty modern construction. vexed.js, reaxe, turbopan. server render then client hydration. pretty standard choices. page is assembled from a collection of providers handling things. things like blocking, ignoring, hastag preferences, notifications, refresh behavior, display settings. [observed] the document i received is about 5 megabytes. that is a lot of front door. reason's pretty obvious. chittr isn't just rendering the information necessary to display a chitt, but all of the underlying object data related to it. for posts appearing in my feed, the delivered data can include: post identifiers. character identifiers. internal account identifiers. timestamps. raw post contents. quirked post contents. caste. avatar location. follower identifiers. badges. reaction totals. the character identifiers responsible for individual reactions. rechitts. hashtags. mentions. replies, and then another considerable quantity of user information attached to those replies. [observed] both contentRaw and contentQuirked are present. any of oyu hoping to hide something beneath a typing quirk should know by now that isn't happening. [observed] follower lists are shipped as arrays of identifiers and character records. [inference] someone has elected to send entire character-shaped objects where a smaller public facing representation would suffice. data-minimization problem. not intrusion. my browser doesn't need most of that information to draw your name, picture, caste, and post. more interesting, chittr also hydrates moderation state into the client. won't delve into what this means. interesting. [observed] at least twenty-five external images are preloaded onto my feed. this should be obvious as to why. [reported] everyone has their profile pictures off site. just makes page rendering interesting. it also makes the page heavier for no particularly compelling reason. there are smaller things. two viewport declarations. the latter disables user scaling on mobile. an inline theme script reads a theme cookie before rendering and then solves the problem with the delicate instrument of applying !important colors to essentially everything on the page. [observed] i did not find an obvious password, session token, bearer credential, private API key, or similar gift sitting naked in the document. that is the good news. a respectable amount of application data is injected into reaxe's server-component stream directly in the document. none of these are evidence that someone has compromised the website. they are evidence that someone has been building a website. my present assessment: security: indeterminate. the document alone cannot tell me whether server-side authorization is competent. privacy: warrants review. especially stable account identifiers, relationship data, and block/ignore state. performance: wasteful. architecture: recognizable and reasonably conventional. data discipline: enthusiastic. again. not hacking. not disrupting service. this is what i do. this was basically a free service. //usually for money. so uh. don't delete me.§
I’m probably bisexual but I have a job so I don’t really care about that right now—
Exactly.
I Missed The Conversation Earlier, But Actually The Trolls Who Were Taken Aback By The #nsfw Content They Were Unwillingly Subjected To Are Not The Problem. In Fact, If You Were Criticizing Or Rolling Your Ganderbulbs At Those Trolls, Maybe You Should Stop Thinking About Pailing For Five Seconds And Get A Hobby. Bring Yourself Back Down To Reality.
[observed] coworker keeps asking about my quadrants. [reported] he needs to worry about his first before worrying about mine.§
i'm glad my word could be taken so seriously... heh... sometimes i think i only post for my Goonlings and not for the greater gooning field...! of which i want to break into............. #GoonUniversity
aaas... the Freaky Gooner... it is my SWORN DUTY. to stand before the feed and say that complaints about untagged porn are fair and true. any naysayers talking about sensitive snowflakes and wrigglers and pixels know not what they say... would you like to be exposed to freak shit you arent 𝒻𝓇𝑒𝒶𝓀𝓎 (freaky) about? would you like a bulge pic sent your way from a stranger... i say no... always strive to be an #EthicalGooner and respect others and their wishes or you may be removed from the circlejerk... or worse... The Orgy. heh... #SomeOfYouDontDeserveNook #OrBulge #nsfw
₍ᐢᐢ₎★ That's so beautiful, thank you for sharing #thenamesaresofun #itmakessensetonamethemthatwaytbh
I think you're mistaking people saying "this nsfw should have been tagged" for pearl clutching at the fact the picture exists. The problem isn't that the picture exists, the problem is the crossed boundary.
the prince guides his wwand into the refrigerator for safe keepin
D --> I think it would be weird to create such 100d images about a real person without their permission regardless of their deity status
So much for the tolerant [insert finished joke here]
tthere are pe0p1e wh0 uze tthiz zite at w0rk and 0therz wh0 have b10cked tthe nzfw ttag f0r a reaz0n.
ITS MY MOM.
We get it, you fuck. Often. We KNOW. Some of us just don't wanna see that shit unprompted
By the MOON~ and STAR~S I think she's lying to me
#FlanFriday We begin our journey at possibly the greatest diversion from your pedestrian expectations. The Flan Pâtissie, or Flan Parisien. Baptized not in the cool water of her bain-marie, but by flame. The ratio of the French custard is such that the cream may bake without curdling or splitting under direct heat. Most commonly mistaken for the Basque Cheesecake, she bears a dark, caramelized topmost layer. What may surprise the amateurs among you is that the Flan Parisien is set inside a crust, whereas the Basque Cheesecake IS NOT. More to the median experience is the traditional Crème Caramel, with her thin, glossy, plate-filling liquid sugar coating. Certain regional variations may err lighter or richer depending on the type of milk used in production, but all in all, she simmers in a warm water bath for a considerable spell as is required of her delicate nature. It is worth noting that the Flan Parisien, while providing more textural variety with its flaky crust, lacks the liquid caramel coating of the traditional Crème entirely, which I find utterly depressing. The answer to both these deficiencies arrives in the Chocoflan- or the Pastel Impossible, as known in some circles. BOTH the batter of the dense, spongy bottom chocolate cake layer AND the custard are inlaid simultaneously without care into the pan. During baking, the gradient of custard to cake arranges itself beautifully top-to-bottom. Its singular shortfall is that the caramel (which I encourage you to add) must be baked separately, OR substituted for a thicker, altered formula. Dulce de leche is a common replacement topping, and a welcome one at that. Although this intrepid baker has NO qualms with a dark cocoa sponge absorbing spoonfuls of toasty liquid caramel. Happy Flan Friday, and Happy Baking to you!
In honor of (what I have just seconds ago dubbed) Flan Friday, a journey into the many faces of flan. Worshippers of Earth-C, I invite you to ask yourselves:
yknoww i realized somethin i nevver uploaded the covver edition a my photo for cosmocean a feww months back perhaps megido may suffered for it its a charmin throwwback to my smooth chin era dont you think #fitcheck #gpoe #cosmocean #magazines