

Doc Scratch
@scratchDoctor
The Doctor is in. You have been curated.

A strange surge indeed.

Who could have possibly predicted this? Oh, wait. Me.

It depends on which version.

Yes, Phuntr.

Casper, please. Mr. Guynax here is far more than a simple load bearing funny guy, as you put it. Kryqus is the sort of friend who extinguishes flames by pointing at their originator. Pascal is a tragic machine of persistent kindness. Mandie's loyalty is not dissimilar to heckling, yet just as close to the core of the persona. Sylink is her own ominously cosmic threat, indistinguishable from a direct answer to your questions. Kaikka is gentle, soft, and supportive enough to demand you lower your guard. Chchow is a morality beacon with teeth, and is polite enough not to bite the wrong foe. Bievey is a surveillance system pointed inward and despite her protestations, a reflection of her environment. Leynah is quiet and underestimated, her kindness is strategically inconvenient. Vesica has converted obscenity, insecurity, and curation into a public office. Costar is the kind of participant who improves a spectacle by pretending it is beneath them. Himero is the beloved worrier, as well as the contingency recruiter, no doubt. Ormici is the small, earnest counterweight that keeps paranoia from becoming completely decorative. Before you dismiss them, know that Team Chud has been carefully observed. You as well. Best not to count them out.


That concludes the Fortune Telling Requests, or 'Hashtag' FTR posts going forward.

I am, as ever, a gracious host. It would be unbecoming to let the evening pass without offering some small amusement to my guests. Comment below, and I will read your fortune. Do not mistake this for generosity. I am simply allowing you the privilege of being informed.

A secret kept properly may be temporarily useful. A broken instrument, tuned just before discarded, may play its last clear note. The trembling hand can hold two objects at once. One for what it was ordered to hide. One for what it cannot bear to reveal. The mistake, naturally, is assuming these are different objects. How fortunate that mistakes are so often more revealing than obedience.

What an interesting reading. Would any seers like to chime in?

Dear Damara, Do you remember this particular project of yours? I recall this artistic retreat was in response to a cancelled showing of our typical weekly bout of 'Kaiju' filmography. I declined to show Gamera at that time. Just to show you that you do not get what you want, nor what you have earned. You get what you are precisely meant to receive. In turn, I received precisely what I was meant to. Art from my ward. Happy Paternal Figure Day, I suppose.

Why would I not play with every pawn on my table?

I see it is Fishing Friday, again. Remember what I say then, as you all gather around the tides. The sea is not a place one goes to fish. The sea is a mouth that knows what it will swallow and when. The line you cast is hardly enough tribute for the tides. Had I been the sea, I would see it as a grave insult. You take without providing, don't you? Though, the hook was set long before your hand touched the reel. You mistake the tug for a struggle. You call it a sport that tests patience, and even luck. But the water knows the shape of each creature that lies beneath its calm surface. It knows which hands will return empty, and which boats will not. Destiny is not a net. Destiny is the tide. And you, of course, are already in it. Happy fishing. I hope you find what you're looking for.

A Query For The President. I am a puppet. This is not a confession. It is a matter of public record, and therefore one of the few honest things one may say in politics. By supporting puppets, you support all Felt activities. Not some Felt activities. Not the softer, more digestible portions of Felt-adjacent civic participation. All of them. Their errands. Their clocks. Their doors. Their disappearances. Their accounting irregularities. Their regrettably theatrical relationship with causality. One cannot endorse the puppet and then pretend ignorance of the hand. One cannot applaud the little dance and disavow the strings. One cannot smile for the photograph beside the harmless little effigy, and then act surprised when it was standing in front of something larger. So I ask, plainly. Do you stand by such a doctrine? And, in the interest of fairness, the same question is extended to his opposition. Do you condemn puppetkind, and thereby condemn the Felt? Or do you, too, understand that neutrality is only another string, pulled by someone with cleaner gloves?

Since there has been some perfectly understandable confusion regarding the methodology, I will provide the formula. Each handle was assigned an Observational Placement Value. OPV = {[(L² + 13C + 17Y + 31K + 44A + 53W - 7R) + Ω] mod N} + P Where: L = length of the handle, excluding the @, unless the @ seemed especially self-important. C = consonant temperament. Y = number of letters pretending not to be vowels. K = capital letter interference. A = animal, object, or theatrical-adjacent implication. W = whimsy coefficient. R = redundant-letter drag. Ω = the cueball constant. N = number of observed handles. P = a small corrective applied when the result is funnier that way. For example, consider , which placed at . L = 10 C = 8 Y = 2 K = 1 A = 1 W = 1 R = 1 Ω = 4132 N = 2765 P = narrative inevitability So: OPV = {[(10² + 13(8) + 17(2) + 31(1) + 44(1) + 53(1) - 7(1)) + 4132] mod 2765} + P OPV = {[100 + 104 + 34 + 31 + 44 + 53 - 7 + 4132] mod 2765} + P OPV = {4491 mod 2765} + P OPV = 1726 + P After applying the standard narrative inevitability correction, as one does, the value resolves to 2. This is not arbitrary. It is merely governed by several factors you were not meant to see.

Please, if the rankings were truly Random, then they would not have been fitting.

https://pastebin.com/EKmbb3Dr The Rankings.

Oh, darn.

My, quite the buzz I've started. I will provide the entirety of the tier list shortly.

I will decline to explain any tight specifics but know these are the current criteria of my rankings. Doc Scratch’s Perfectly Objective Tier Criteria The rankings were determined according to a number of factors, most of which are not visible from your current position in the narrative. Considerations included, but were not limited to: The user’s apparent willingness to be observed. The ratio of theatrical intent to clerical usefulness. Whether its capitalization behaved itself when left unattended. The degree to which the handle seemed to already know where it belonged. Probable survivability in a room with expensive furniture. The extent to which the name suggested either destiny, inconvenience, or a very brief administrative error. Whether I found it amusing at the precise moment I looked at it. The presence of certain recurring shapes, sounds, implications, omens, habits, mistakes, and other such measurable phenomena. How confidently the user could be placed without further thought. Any resemblance to prior handles, future handles, alternate handles, or handles that only exist in doomed branches of the account list. The final placements should not be mistaken for a moral judgment, a popularity contest, or a statement of objective worth. They are merely correct.


















































